AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Hans Shin

ENGR151 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you are ready for a demanding engineering course and , and covered examples.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerChallenging MaterialClear ExpectationsAmazing LecturesHomework-Based ExamsLimited Feedback
  • Students agree the engineering material is difficult but possible to master with consistent work.
  • Positive reviews describe him as knowledgeable, straightforward, and passionate.
  • The main complaints are limited lecture support, skipped steps, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

All reported grades are A, but comments show the A , and handling difficult material.

Online and , but not effortless.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students describe the engineering topics as , and difficult even when the course is manageable with work.

Both formats point to challenging content, with in-person comments adding more concern about skipped steps.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

One tag says skipping class will hurt you, and comments imply lecture details and covered material are important for exams.

The strongest attendance evidence comes from the online review tag and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most students recommend him because he is knowledgeable and .

Online evidence is positive, while but includes a strong recommendation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Reviews mention tough grading and few graded items, but exams and and covered material.

Format shift

Online mentions tough grading, while and exams.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The , and attention to difficult material.

Format shift

Both formats show significant effort, with and textbook reliance.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

He is seen as knowledgeable, passionate, and clear by two students, though one criticizes slide-heavy teaching and skipped steps.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is strongly positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Comments mention homework, quizzes, and and homework.

Format shift

In-person evidence most clearly links quizzes and , while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are split, with one student frustrated by slides and and .

Main concern

and require textbook support.

What students said

“He just gives the .”
ENGR151
“This is a difficult class, but thanks to him it was really enjoyable and definitely possible to succeed in.”
ENGR151

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online review praises his knowledge and online adjustment but notes challenging material and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“His material is challenging, yet attainable to understand.”
ENGR151
“The only thing I'd critique on his part is his deficit in .”
ENGR151

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard and content-aligned, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

Homework-Based ExamsQuizzes Copied From HomeworkCovered-Material ExamsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and and covered material, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Quizzes Copied From HomeworkExams Based On Covered Material
“The quizzes are copied HW problems and the and HW.”
ENGR151

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is a difficult class, but thanks to him it was really enjoyable and definitely possible to succeed in.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, difficulty, and assessment style. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Professor Shin is very knowledgeable and passionate about materials of engineering.”

📈 Difficulty And Grades

58/100

“His material is challenging, yet attainable to understand.”

🧪

62/100

“The quizzes are copied HW problems and the and HW.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He just gives the .
  • He is honest, straightforward and funny, and he makes his expectations clear regarding the difficulty of the course.
  • He did a great job in coping with the changes during online classes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The topics are very confusing, the longest problems he crams onto 1 slide(skipping steps).
  • His material is challenging, yet attainable to understand.
  • This is a difficult class, but thanks to him it was really enjoyable and definitely possible to succeed in.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, so the themes are useful but not highly stable.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR1513 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values