AI Rate Professor

Economics

Tony Robertson

ECON201 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

unless you already know economics well and , and intense stress.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExtremely difficultTest heavyHeavy readingHarsh grading pressureLow recommendation
  • Most students describe ECON201 as extremely difficult, stressful, and test dominated.
  • Students repeatedly say homework and study guides do not prepare them well for quizzes or exams.
  • and feedback, but the overall pattern is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Even A students describe extreme reading, stress, and test pressure, so getting an A appears very hard rather than easy.

Both formats point to difficult assessments, with effort.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Students describe the course as one of their hardest classes, with dense reading and fast test expectations.

, while the lone online review also reports severe assessment problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

because reviews say skipping class means you will not pass.

The attendance concern comes from in-person tags and comments, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

because the class feels stressful, test-heavy, and poorly aligned with preparation materials.

Both online and in-person evidence are negative, though .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Grades depend heavily on difficult tests, and several students say good grades are nearly impossible despite major effort.

Format shift

evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Students report , and test preparation that still may not pay off.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most workload evidence, while the online and .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

and feedback, but most say lectures are boring, unengaging, or misaligned with tests.

Format shift

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly negative, while the single online review is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

92/100

The course is repeatedly described as test-heavy, with quizzes and .

Format shift

Both formats mention assessment pressure, and as the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly describe the class as , and difficult to earn a strong grade in.

Main concern

Grades depend heavily on tough tests that many students feel .

What students said

“This class is one of the toughest classes I have ever taken at COC.”
ECON201
“It is impossible for one to get a high grade unless you are a as your grade depends on it.”
ECON201

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The only online review is highly negative and says quizzes and the .

Main concern

Online assessments may feel unpredictable and emotionally punishing.

What students said

“The study guides and the quizzes.”
ECON201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because comments repeatedly describe hard, high-stakes tests and poor alignment between study materials and assessments.

Test HeavyQuizzes Poorly Matched to HomeworkFinal Mismatch ReportedHigh-Stakes Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

reading and homework often do not prepare students well enough for exams.

Test HeavyHigh-Stakes ExamsStudy Guides Poorly Aligned
“It is impossible for one to get a high grade unless you are a as your grade depends on it.”
ECON201
“ .”
ECON201

Online

The online review says homework and study guides did not prepare students for quizzes and that the final did not use the promised quiz questions, but it does .

Quizzes Poorly Matched to HomeworkFinal Mismatch Reported
“NONE of the ”
ECON201

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“So for the sake of your sanity, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Recommendation Risk

18/100

“ .”

🧠 Course Difficulty

15/100

“This class is one of the toughest classes I have ever taken at COC.”

📝

18/100

“It is impossible for one to get a high grade unless you are a as your grade depends on it.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • I read 100 pages of the textbook every night before the exams
  • his 400 pages of reading and his lack of teaching variation

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests and Grades

  • The study guides and the quizzes.
  • as damage control for

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , so reading the book is easier after lectures.
  • his lectures are all him talking with no sort of draws on the whiteboard.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed reviews across online and difficulty, test pressure, and low recommendation.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ECON2019 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2