AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Salvador Pineda

ENGR152 · ENGI151 · ENGR151 · ENGR151L · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you value a caring professor and can handle tougher engineering problems and tests.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and AccessibleClear FeedbackLenient Lab GradingTough TestsConcepts Can Be Confusing
  • Students describe Pineda as caring, knowledgeable, and .
  • and engineering reviews are much stronger than the single online review.
  • Tests and harder problem-solving can be tough, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible with steady work, but and engineering problem-solving keep it from being easy.

Online evidence is harder and test-heavy, while and stronger support.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content is standard-to-challenging engineering material, with hard problems and .

The online review stresses hard problems, while in-person reviews describe clearer support but .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

hurts passing, and no review clearly says attendance is optional.

Attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews; the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend him because , and , though the online test experience is weaker.

In-person students are strongly positive, while the only .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

as very lenient and tests may be curved, though .

Format shift

Online mentions a , while in-person reviews give clearer evidence of lenient or .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload includes lab reports and hard problem practice, but reviews do not describe it as overwhelming.

Format shift

The online review emphasizes extra problem practice, while .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Students mostly describe him as , and fast with feedback, with some limits in explaining difficult content.

Format shift

, while the online review suggests weaker help and shorter lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Reviews mention tests, quizzes, lab reports, homework-style problems, and a .

Format shift

Online evidence is test-heavy, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly praise , and fair or .

Main concern

Some .

What students said

“There was a report for , but he is very lenient in .”
ENGR151L
“ as well.”
ENGI151
“ .”
ENGR151

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online review reports short , and limited help despite a curve.

Main concern

and help may feel limited.

What students said

“Lectures are very short, problems are very hard.”
ENGR152
“ , but .”
ENGR152

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes appear mostly standard but sometimes tough, with and another saying tests follow class material.

Tough TestsCurved TestsFinal QuizClass-Aligned Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and midterms but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Final QuizClass-Aligned TestsFast Midterm Grading
“There was also a final quiz for our class which was 3/10 in difficulty.”
ENGR151L
“The quizzes and .”
ENGI151

Online

The and curved but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Tough TestsCurved Tests
“ , but .”
ENGR152

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Pineda's awesome! He really knows his stuff and he's kind and caring and goes out of his way to answer people's questions and address concerns.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“He really knows his stuff and he's kind and caring and goes out of his way to answer people's questions and address concerns.”

⚖️

70/100

“There was a report for , but he is very lenient in .”

🧪

52/100

“ , but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He conveyed the topics missed in class extremely well, and is very down-to-earth.
  • and works hard to do well.
  • He really knows his stuff and he's kind and caring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lectures are very short, problems are very hard.
  • There was a report for , but he is very lenient in .
  • The quizzes and .

Theme 3

💬 About Support

  • as well.
  • and he responds to emails really fast.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews across but limited online evidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGI1511 review
ENGR1511 review
ENGR151L1 review
ENGR1521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values