AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Dursun Tepeli

CMPSCI236 · COMPSCI236 · CS236 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor CommunicationConfusing LecturesTest HeavyHarsh Exam WeightingAvoided by Students
  • All students .
  • Students repeatedly criticize unclear explanations, slow responses, and .
  • Grades depend heavily on .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

because short, high-weight exams punish small mistakes heavily.

Both online and in-person evidence show high-stakes exams, with the not rewarded.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course feels harder than its content should because , and students must self-teach.

Online reviews stress poor lectures and vague exams, while the difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly mention attendance rules or .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students overwhelmingly reject the course because of poor teaching, poor communication, and .

Both formats are negative, with online reviews adding more evidence about communication and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Short, heavily weighted exams make each missed question costly, and students .

Format shift

Both formats show harsh grading, with the .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Homework and programs can take major effort, but .

Format shift

Online reviews mention many slides and exam-heavy grading, while the students.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students consistently describe him as a poor explainer with weak communication and little useful clarification.

Format shift

Online reviews are strongly negative about lectures and communication, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

, and finals, with programs and as undervalued.

Format shift

Both formats show and finals with large grade weight.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review focuses on a and exams dominate the grade.

Main concern

exam losses.

What students said

“ .”
CS236
“The midterm and final, 9 and 15 questions, was 55% of your grade total.”
CS236

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe poor explanations, , and a high risk of grade damage.

Main concern

Short exams and .

What students said

“ .”
COMPSCI236
“final was worth 30% & only 15 qs.”
CMPSCI236
“Do urself a ”
CMPSCI236

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are short, heavily weighted, and described as vague, making the .

Short High-Stakes ExamsVague QuestionsFinal Worth 30 PercentMidterm And Final Worth 55 Percent

Assessment risk

Strict

12/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and and worth 55 percent, but it does not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Short MidtermShort FinalMidterm And Final Worth 55 Percent
“The midterm and final, 9 and 15 questions, was 55% of your grade total.”
CS236

Online

Online reviews mention short, heavily weighted exams and vague questions but do not clearly .

Short High-Stakes ExamsVague QuestionsFinal Worth 30 Percent
“final was worth 30% & only 15 qs.”
CMPSCI236
“other qs were vague so you have to make a guess that can ruin your grade.”
CMPSCI236

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do urself a ”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“Do urself a ”

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ .”

⚖️

8/100

“I got perfect scores on all the homework and yet because I missed about 13 points->C.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures were the .
  • and he is a very poor explainer.
  • horrible with communicating.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams

  • His exams were a horrible way to assess our learning b/ .
  • final was worth 30% & only 15 qs.
  • The midterm and final, 9 and 15 questions, was 55% of your grade total.

Theme 3

📉 About Grades

  • he will screw u over after all ur hard work.
  • if you are not experienced, barely even mattered at the end.
  • missing a single question does a lot of harm.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent reviews are detailed and highly consistent, though the sample size is still limited.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CMPSCI2362 reviews
COMPSCI2361 review
CS2361 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values