AI Rate Professor

English

David Wallace

ENGLISH105 · ENGL102 · ENGL105 · ENG102 · ENG105 · ENG101 · ENGLISH102 · ENG96 · ENG103 · ENGL109 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you are willing to attend, write drafts, and use feedback, but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear grading criteriaEssay focusedMixed lecture qualityHelpful feedbackAttendance matters
  • and gradeable if they did the essays and attended peer work.
  • The only online review and rude communication.
  • The course is usually manageable, but and lecture usefulness vary by student and course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

In person, an A is realistic with , and peer critiques, but the online review shows a high-effort near-A was not bumped.

Online evidence is negative and strict, while if you do the work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Most students describe the English courses as manageable, though creative writing and .

Online evidence points to confusion, while content.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but and peer critiques are important for grades.

The , while in-person reviews stress showing up for graded class work.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and fairness, but several strongly criticize unclear teaching and grading.

The , while but more favorable overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

and criteria-based in person, but the online review describes tough and .

Format shift

, while online grading evidence is harsh.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The class centers on several essays, peer work, reading, and participation rather than a tiny workload.

Format shift

Online mentions many papers, while as manageable.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students often praise his care and feedback, but some find lectures boring, generic, or confusing.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is very negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grades are mainly built around essays, peer workshops, participation, and .

Format shift

and workshops; online assessment evidence is limited to papers and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but lean positive, with , and peer critiques make an A realistic.

Main concern

Lectures can feel boring, unclear, or too general for some students.

What students said

“If , and actually try to improve your writing skills, this class is a piece of cake.”
ENG101
“ and make sure you're there for , and you'll get an easy A.”
ENGL102
“He is extremely unclear, his explanations are riddled with contradictions, and he is just not a nice person.”
ENGLISH105

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The , and a painful near-A outcome.

Main concern

and poor communication.

What students said

“The .”
ENG103
“I worked so hard to end up with a 89.1%”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a , but they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or open-book rules.

Final Exam MentionedEssay-Based GradingExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but not the final format or strictness.

Final Exam MentionedEssay-Based Grading
“He grades on 3 essays, peer workshops, participation, and .”
ENG103

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If , and actually try to improve your writing skills, this class is a piece of cake.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Professor Wallace is a great professor who uses several methods in explaining to all levels of students, helping students to reach the .”

📈 Grade Path

78/100

“ and make sure you're there for , and you'll get an easy A.”

⚠️ Mixed Clarity

68/100

“Half of his lectures were useful, and the other half seemed irrelevant.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He was a !
  • Professor Wallace is an amazing teacher and got me more interested in poetry and literature.
  • He does not teach, Lecture's are off topic and confusing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you show up to class and do your work, you will do fine.
  • come to class, . you will get A.
  • I worked so hard to end up with a 89.1%

Theme 3

📝

  • He critiques in a manner that makes you feel bad about what you write.
  • you'll never get your rough drafts back with stuff you need to change.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across many years give rich but somewhat mixed evidence, with .

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1053 reviews
ENG1012 reviews
ENG1032 reviews
ENGL1052 reviews
1021 review
Show 6 more courses
ENG1021 review
ENG961 review
ENGL1021 review
ENGL1091 review
ENGLISH1021 review
ENGLISH1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1