AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

T. Klein

TRIG102 · MATH103 · MATH102 · MATH70 · MATHTRIG · MATH070 · MATH140 · MATH104 · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless , and rely on study guides for tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy homeworkConfusing lecturesTough graderTest heavySelf-teaching required
  • Most students describe , frequent mistakes, and needing to teach themselves.
  • as excessive, especially in compressed terms and online.
  • A few students succeed by attending, using study guides, and , but the overall recommendation signal is poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students get A grades by using study guides and homework, but many , and GPA damage.

Online evidence says an A required 35-60+ hours weekly, while guides.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Math content becomes harder because , and often require self-teaching.

Both formats show difficulty, with the online review emphasizing workload and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

skipping class means you will not pass.

In-person evidence supports strict attendance expectations, while the single .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students warn against taking him because , and workload are poor.

Both the online review and few in-person defenders.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly call him a tough or and say small formatting .

Format shift

Online tags include tough grader, and .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

hours of work and excessive written requirements.

Format shift

Online workload is described as 35-60+ hours weekly, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews say lectures are confusing, book-based, mistake-prone, boring, or not helpful.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is workload-focused, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews describe tests, quizzes, finals, and study guides as the main grade drivers, with but time-consuming.

Format shift

, while online assessment detail is limited beyond homework and tough grading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and test-heavy grading.

Main concern

Students often feel they must teach themselves while and .

What students said

“ if you can.”
MATH070
“Teach yourself because he has no idea how to teach.”
MATH103
“ . Hard class:(”
MATH070

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The only online review describes an extreme workload and strongly warns against the summer class.

Main concern

The online workload can become overwhelming.

What students said

“The class was class is 35-60+ hours per week easily to get an A.”
MATH104
“ .”
MATH104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and important study guides, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyStudy Guides ImportantFinal Exam MentionedStrict GradingExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

guides and finals, but not the exact exam security rules.

Test HeavyStudy Guides ImportantFinal Exam MentionedStrict Grading
“Literally, more than 90% of the .”
MATH103
“ ! Lots and lots of homework!”
MATH070
“Tests/quiz=75% 5%=homework final= 20%.”
MATH70

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Teach yourself because he has no idea how to teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and recommendations. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Teach yourself because he has no idea how to teach.”

📚 Workload

10/100

“The amount of no life outside of this class and the homework he assigns.”

⚖️

22/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His 'teaching' is him reviewing his pre-printed notes in class.
  • He makes a lot of mistakes and is often corrected by students.
  • He teaches straight out of the book and overcomplicates things.
  • Great at explaining the subject and gives lots of partial credit!

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • After lecture I was always swamped with homework.
  • The sheer amount of .
  • The class was class is 35-60+ hours per week easily to get an A.

Theme 3

🧪

  • .
  • .
  • ! Lots and lots of homework!
  • His class messed up a lot of peoples GPAs.

Theme 4

👍 About Recommendation

  • if you can.
  • WARNING!! !
  • .
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years give detailed, consistent evidence, with a strong negative majority and a .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 55
3 out of 56
2 out of 55
1 out of 530

Course coverage

MATH07020 reviews
MATH1038 reviews
MATH706 reviews
MATH1045 reviews
MATH1024 reviews
Show 5 more courses
0702 reviews
TRIG1022 reviews
1001 review
MATH1401 review
MATHTRIG1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 3 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

2

D 1 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 4