AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Eric Pearce

FT105 · FIRETC101 · FT104 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you can work independently from the ebook and tolerate unreliable communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProEasy quizzesBook-based examsPoor communicationDiscussion-heavyMixed reliability
  • Coursework and .
  • Student experience is inconsistent, with one strong online review and .
  • Recommendation is weak because communication problems can seriously affect grades and support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

The work can be easy and book-based, but poor responsiveness can create real grade risk if something goes wrong.

Online evidence includes both an easy A and a D+ tied to lack of help, while the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The course content seems manageable because quizzes and , though students may need to teach themselves.

Online reviews describe book-based quizzes and exams, while the material on their own.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an , and the online or hybrid structure .

Neither online nor in-person-counted .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because communication is repeatedly criticized despite one highly positive review.

Online reviews conflict, while the in-person-counted review is strongly negative about the online-class experience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and easy when book-based, but missed support and a D+ show the system is not reliably forgiving.

Format shift

Online evidence includes clear grading and an easy A but also a D+ after a , while the .

Workload

Light

76/100

, and a short final paper, with several comments calling the tasks easy.

Format shift

Online reviews describe light book-based work, while the than workload volume.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching quality is dragged down by repeated reports of no email response and little .

Format shift

Online evidence is mixed, while the in-person-counted review is clearly negative about instructor engagement.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Assessment leans test-heavy with , and a final paper.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention quizzes, midterm, final, and paper, while the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person-counted review describes an online FT-105 experience with no instructor presence and poor communication.

Main concern

The professor may provide little visible instruction or feedback.

What students said

“Never responded to emails.”
FT105

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews agree the work is book-based and easy, but they sharply disagree and helpful.

Main concern

and support are unreliable.

What students said

“ midterm final exam and final paper.”
FIRETC101
“emailed him hoping for help, and he never got back to me.”
FT104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard and book-based, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

Book-Based QuizzesMidterm ExamFinal ExamFinal Paper

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, or open-book rules.

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, a midterm, a , and a final paper, but .

Book-Based QuizzesMidterm ExamFinal ExamFinal Paper
“ midterm final exam and final paper.”
FIRETC101
“The mid term and as the .”
FT104

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The mid term and as the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in communication, assessments, and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Assessment Pattern

72/100

“The mid term and as the .”

⚠️ Communication Risk

42/100

“Never responded to emails.”

👍

38/100

“I missed my midterm by accident I gave him a call and he reopened it just so .”

Theme 1

📘 About Workload

  • midterm final exam and final paper.
  • , the questions were ripped word for word from the book.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Communication

  • Never responded to emails.
  • emailed him hoping for help, and he never got back to me.
  • Took him for online ft-105 and he made no effort to show an appearance at all.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • The so easy minimum 3-5 pages.
  • Only took his class because it was the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only 3 reviews, but they provide concrete and partially consistent evidence about easy book-based work and poor communication.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FIRETC1011 review
FT1041 review
FT1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values