AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Bob Farkas

AJ110 · ADMJUS101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a highly respected professor who rewards real effort with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExcellent professorClear gradingMotivating lecturesEssay effort requiredTest preparation needed
  • Both reviews are highly positive and .
  • Teaching quality appears excellent, with and motivating lectures.
  • The course is not a free A because students still need to study for tests and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Both reported grades are A, but the detailed review says students must study for tests and .

Online evidence only shows a positive A outcome, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The course appears manageable but not easy because tests and .

Online evidence is too brief to judge content difficulty, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither online nor in-person evidence clearly establishes an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend him for , and supportive teaching.

Both formats are positive, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

and fair rather than effortless, with A outcomes but and tests.

Format shift

, while and tests require work.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload appears moderate because students mention a few essays and .

Format shift

Online workload evidence is minimal, while and test study.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Teaching experience is excellent because both reviews are 5-star and the detailed review praises his professionalism, care, and motivating lectures.

Format shift

Online evidence is brief but positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment appears balanced between essays and online detail.

Format shift

Online evidence does not describe assessments, while and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The in-person review strongly praises his professionalism, care, lectures, and grading clarity while and .

Main concern

Students should study for tests and .

What students said

“Put some effort into the essays.”
AJ110
“Study for his tests.”
AJ110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review is very positive but too brief to prove much beyond strong satisfaction and .

Main concern

The review .

What students said

“ ”
ADMJUS101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students are told to study for tests, and reviews do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

Tests Require StudyEssays Required

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person review says students should study for tests but does not .

Tests Require Study
“Study for his tests.”
AJ110

Online

The online review does not clearly describe exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and effort required. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“One of the !”

⚖️

72/100

“ .”

📚 Effort Required

70/100

“Put some effort into the essays.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and all around amazing.
  • .
  • Very motivating and encouraging.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Put some effort into the essays.
  • Study for his tests.
  • I only had a few.

Theme 3

👍 About Recommendation

  • Cant say enough good things.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only 2 reviews are available and one is extremely brief, even though both are strongly positive.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ADMJUS1011 review
AJ1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values