AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gevork Demirchyan

MATH115 · MATH146 · MATH102 · MATH155 · MATH60 · COS126 · STATS140 · MATH060 · MATH227 · MATH140 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
94.12%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if possible, because students describe strong support and , while online workload may be much heavier.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear and organizedCaring and helpfulStudy guidesManageable in personOnline workload risk
  • In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with , and hands-on help.
  • Online evidence is split, with one strong praise review and one severe workload complaint.
  • Getting a strong grade looks realistic for students who attend, practice, and keep up with assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is very reachable with steady work because , and keeps grading clear.

grades, while one online review says the workload was too much.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students often say he makes math understandable, though a few reviews mention fast lectures and .

, while online evidence is too limited and mixed.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

and help, but comments also show some flexibility with assignments and student needs.

In-person reviews mention class practice and , while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

89/100

Most students strongly recommend him because , and willing to help.

, while online recommendations are split by workload experience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and provides study guides that make grading feel fair.

Format shift

Both formats mention dropped scores or , but the stronger .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Most in-person students find the work manageable, but online and some math reviews describe a lot of homework.

Format shift

Online workload appears much heavier based on one severe review, while as reasonable.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly , and willingness to help.

Format shift

, while online reviews are limited and mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades appear to rely on homework, class practice, study guides, tests, and a .

Format shift

, and finals, while online comments mainly mention homework and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students consistently describe him as , and fair with .

Main concern

A few students mention too much work or fast lectures, but most find the class manageable.

What students said

“Chillest math prof I've taken.”
MATH140
“He takes you step by step when he does his lectures.”
MATH60
“Skips steps during lecture, moves too fast, gives too much work.”
MATH060

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with one student praising his help and another dropping .

Main concern

The main risk and stress.

What students said

“ because his work load was way too much.”
MATH227
“He is amazing and is always willing to help out.”
COS126

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support a , and dropped low scores, but they do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Study GuidesDropped Lowest ExamCurved TestsCumulative Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and dropped low grades, but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

Study GuidesCurved TestsDropped Lowest ExamCumulative Exams
“Study guides were provided for grade.”
MATH115
“Tests and the but he gives you study guides you can go over in class.”
MATH102

Online

Online reviews mention exams and dropped lowest score, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home rules.

Dropped Lowest Exam
“out of 4 exams he drops your lowest score.”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If would! Wonderful professor!”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He takes you step by step when he does his lectures.”

👍 Recommendation Level

89/100

“ .”

⚖️

78/100

“ if students really need it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Top notch professor. Clear and organized class.
  • Made stats easy to understand.
  • He makes sure you understand everyhing and .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Workload

  • Gives study guides.
  • Do your work and you'll be fine.
  • because his work load was way too much.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • and happy to answer questions.
  • He cares so much about the students and always walks around the classroom, offering his help.
  • He is amazing and is always willing to help out.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 18 reviews across many years are detailed and mostly consistent, with .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1408 reviews
MATH602 reviews
COS1261 review
MATH0601 review
MATH1021 review
Show 5 more courses
MATH1151 review
MATH1461 review
MATH1551 review
MATH2271 review
STATS1401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values