AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Shana Williams

PSYM01 · PSYCH101 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle heavy writing, fast lectures, and self-directed studying.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing lecturesHeavy papersFast pacedHarsh classroom toneTest heavy
  • Students describe unclear, lecture-heavy teaching with poor slides and .
  • The course , and exams.
  • Grades can still be high, but students say the A comes through hard work rather than ease.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

A grades are possible, but students describe , and doing major work to earn them.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The content feels harder because , and assessments require heavy writing and memorization.

All course and PSYM reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Multiple tags say skipping class means failing, and students mention random calling and participation pressure.

online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students would not take her again because they found the , and the classroom tone unpleasant.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

31/100

Students report and heavy assessment demands, even though a few earned A grades through hard work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students repeatedly mention , and community service.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe poor explanations, unreadable slides, boring lectures, sarcasm, and little useful support.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment mixes , and essay-format tests.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and stressful exams.

Main concern

The and testing load.

What students said

“Very fast paced.”
PSYCH101
“Long, boring lectures straight out of the textbook, with fonts and text colors that are unreadable.”
PSYM01
“Although I got an A, it was through hard work.”
PSYCH101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

Essay TestsScantron TestsLong MidtermsPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention essay-format tests, scantron tests, assessment tests, midterms, and pop quizzes, but .

Essay TestsScantron TestsLong MidtermsPop Quizzes
“Had to do two presentations, assessments tests that we had to write down using a bluebook”
PSYCH101
“All of .”
PSYCH101
“her midterms are more than 80 questions and a .”
PSYCH101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Although I got an A, it was through hard work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“She assigns two 10 page essays just weeks apart with .”

⚖️ Grade Effort

34/100

“Although I got an A, it was through hard work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She talked more about herself than the subject.
  • .
  • Long, boring lectures straight out of the textbook, with fonts and text colors that are unreadable.

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • She assigns two 10 page essays just weeks apart with .
  • All of .
  • Basically shes obsessed with essays

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very fast paced.
  • Although I got an A, it was through hard work.
  • So study study!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed reviews across several years show a consistent negative pattern, but the sample is small and older.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSYCH1014 reviews
PSYM011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values