AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tom Ogimachi

MATH102 · M03 · MATH60 · MATH058 · MATH070 · MATH060 · MATH140 · MATH075 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid Ogimachi unless and , and inconsistent support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderSelf-teaching requiredTests do not match lecturesHigh stressAvoid
  • Most students report , and needing to teach themselves.
  • Tests and quizzes are described as much harder than lectures or homework.
  • A , but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and poor instruction even after studying.

The online review is negative, while the much larger in-person set gives the strongest evidence of and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Some math material may be manageable, but the course feels much harder because and .

Both formats report unclear teaching, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Attendance and participation appear strict, with comments about participation, quizzes, and not passing if class is skipped.

This is mainly supported by in-person reviews; the single online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students strongly warn against taking him because of poor teaching, stress, and harsh assessments.

Both formats are negative, but the avoid recommendation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Many reviews call him a and .

Format shift

the online review also describing him as strict.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Workload evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students describe unclear explanations, self-teaching, missing class, and rude responses to questions.

Format shift

Both formats criticize teaching, but .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are described as mainly test-based, with .

Format shift

Assessment evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly , and rude classroom behavior.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say tests do not match instruction and grades suffer even with effort.

What students said

“I had to self teach after every class!”
MATH060
“ and are much harder than what he teaches in class.”
MATH070

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative, saying he is strict and incomprehensible.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, but it reports severe teaching problems.

What students said

“Strict teacher and incomprehensibly explains I regretted not having dropped this class”
MATH060

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews repeatedly describe difficult tests and quizzes that do not match the homework or lectures, but they .

Test HeavyTough TestsQuizzesTests Do Not Match Lectures

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and test-heavy grading, but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

Test HeavyTough TestsQuizzesTests Do Not Match Lectures
“ !”
MATH060
“ and are much harder than what he teaches in class.”
MATH070

Online

The online review says the teacher is strict and hard to understand, but it does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“IF YOU WANT TO !!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“You basically teach yourself the material.”

⚖️

12/100

“He and grades very low.”

🧪

18/100

“ and are much harder than what he teaches in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You basically teach yourself the material.
  • He is not very friendly either...
  • Doesn't care to help you when you ask questions or try to raise your grade

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I am an A student and I got a D in his class.
  • !
  • He and grades very low.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Warnings

  • Don't waste your time with this teacher.
  • .
  • if you want a good grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across several years show a consistent negative pattern with detailed complaints.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH0606 reviews
MATH1403 reviews
MATH1022 reviews
M031 review
MATH0581 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH0701 review
MATH0751 review
MATH601 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1