AI Rate Professor

Physics

Antonio Nassar

PHYSIC101 · PHYS101 · PHYS222 · PHYS110 · PHYSI101 · PHYSIC110 · PHYSICS101 · PHY101 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you mainly want an easy physics grade and can tolerate weak organization and limited learning.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery Easy ALow Learning ValueDisorganized TeachingGenerous CurvesConceptual Physics
  • Students repeatedly say the class is easy to pass and often easy to get an A.
  • Teaching quality is highly inconsistent, with many .
  • The deep physics learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

Reviews repeatedly say tests come from study guides or , and good grades are easy despite weak teaching.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The class is described as conceptual, basic, and often too easy to feel engaging.

All course easiness evidence is from in-person PHYS 101 and PHYS 110 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Showing up and participating helps, but several reviews imply class attendance is not always valuable for learning.

, and they frame it as useful for grades more than learning.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

because the class may be easy but and learning is limited.

All recommendation evidence is in person, with recent reviews especially negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students report , and grades that can exceed actual understanding.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

Homework and test preparation are often described as easy, especially when students use reviews or practice questions.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students enjoy him, but , and little learning.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison available.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades appear , and curves.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

with inconsistent teaching and low engagement.

Main concern

Many students say they learned little despite receiving good grades.

What students said

“Literally impossible to fail, unless you don't show up or turn anything in.”
PHYSIC101
“Gave good grades to appease. You learn nothing.”
PHYS110
“If you want to waste time and .”
PHYSIC110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually student-friendly because questions often come from study guides or homework and , though organization is unreliable.

Study Guide-Based TestsHomework-Based TestsGenerous CurvesFinal Notice Unclear

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews say tests often match study guides or homework, but .

Study Guide-Based TestsHomework-Based TestsGenerous CurvesFinal Notice Unclear
“ .”
PHYSIC101
“Only complaint with the class is that it's almost too easy because of the .”
PHYS222
“Wasn't told if we even had a final until 2 days prior to sem end.”
PHYS110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If it weren't for the A, it would have been a complete and utter waste of time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in grades, teaching clarity, and learning value; credibility rating: High.

📈 Easy A Potential

93/100

“He gives you the questions and answers to the .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“If you want to waste time and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

36/100

“If you actually want to feel engaged and learn the fundamental concepts of .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Extremely easy, no math (it's conceptual physics).
  • He gives you the questions and answers to the .
  • Tests and .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Goes off tangents, doesn't always make what he's teaching or .
  • His sentences are basically incoherent, I feel like I never even have to show up to class.
  • Awesome Professor! The man loves physics and is very big on the fundamental concepts.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Learning Value

  • You learn nothing.
  • Too easy to feel engaged or learn anything.
  • If you actually want to .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 16 in-person reviews span many years and consistently show an easy class with disputed teaching quality.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PHY1013 reviews
PHYS1013 reviews
PHYSIC1012 reviews
PHYSIC1102 reviews
PHYSICS1012 reviews
Show 4 more courses
1011 review
PHYS1101 review
PHYS2221 review
PHYSI1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values