AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Jack Irwin

CONST104 · CONST102 · CONST106 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

if you want deep course coverage and , and a demanding style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy HomeworkHard TestsDeep CoveragePolarizingCares But Demanding
  • Positive reviews say Jack Irwin teaches in depth, gives useful lectures, and cares about student learning.
  • Negative reviews describe tons of , and belittling behavior.
  • The course is high-effort and polarizing, with outcomes depending heavily on tolerance for workload and teaching style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears possible but , and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The material is covered in depth and , and demanding weekly work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Some students strongly recommend him for depth and learning, while and treatment.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

One positive reviewer says he is not unfair, but and lower reported grades keep grading from feeling lenient.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Multiple reviews describe tons of , and assignments taking hours.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

and useful lectures offset by complaints about belittling and poor help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention , and a final, so assessment is mixed.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

depth and strong criticism of workload and treatment of students.

Main concern

Expect , and a polarizing classroom style.

What students said

“you have to give 100%”
CONST102
“Lots of homework and a lot of reading so you need to be ready.”
CONST106
“Avoid if you can”
CONST102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as hard, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book status, closed-book status, or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsMidtermFinalReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Book Or Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

43/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final, but they do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsMidtermFinal
“ ”
CONST104
“before the midterm and again before the final”
CONST106

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lots of homework and a lot of reading so you need to be ready.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting workload, teaching quality, and polarized student outcomes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“He has good lectures and they are very useful for the tests.”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“Lots of homework and a lot of reading so you need to be ready.”

⚖️ Polarized Experience

56/100

“Avoid if you can”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he actually covers the subject matter in depth
  • He has good lectures and they are very useful for the tests.
  • His lectures are pointless and he loves to belittle students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you have to give 100%
  • , but he's not an .
  • Tons of homework.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload And Concerns

  • I would spend all Sunday on the weekly questions and often more on reports
  • Gives pointless homework that takes hours to complete(3-5 hours on average)
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because but opinions are sharply polarized and some are old.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CONST1023 reviews
CONST1041 review
CONST1061 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1