AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Al Saberi

ENGR101 · ENGR10137887 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself and only need a potentially manageable grade path.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnreliable Course DeliverySparse ExplanationsLecture HeavyLow Recommendation
  • Students report very weak course execution and .
  • Lecture coverage appears narrow, so students may need to fill gaps alone.
  • because problems , but the teaching experience is poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A seems possible because , but students still need to follow his exact method and self-fill missing material.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content is not described as deeply hard, but .

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One review says participation matters, but the comments do not clearly prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Students strongly reject retaking him because of poor delivery and an abrupt course disruption.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

slides, but students must use the professor's method.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not described as heavy, but self-teaching may add hidden effort.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students , and a lack of dependable instruction.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and participation, but do not clearly define the full assessment mix.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe unreliable delivery and limited .

Main concern

The main concern is weak teaching consistency and limited conceptual coverage.

What students said

“And he just quit.”
ENGR101
“He lectures on one item per section for mathematical concepts and expects you to know everything else.”
ENGR10137887

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the exam policy.

Problems From Lecture SlidesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“he pulls problems straight from the .”
ENGR10137887

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He lectures on one item per section for mathematical concepts and expects you to know everything else.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“He lectures on one item per section for mathematical concepts and expects you to know everything else.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

10/100

“I really hope if he applies to another university they have read this.”

📘 Grade Path

55/100

“Seems easy, but, make sure you do things the professors way.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He lectures on one item per section for mathematical concepts and expects you to know everything else.
  • This dude literally quit in the middle of the semster, because he couldn't learn how to use zoom.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he pulls problems straight from the .
  • Seems easy, but, make sure you do things the professors way.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but both are detailed enough and consistently negative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGR1011 review
ENGR101378871 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values