AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nathan Agassi

STATISTICS140 · MATH14021649 · STATS136 · STATS140 · MATH140 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
30.77%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take Nathan Agassi only if you , and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProVery soft spokenTest heavyMandatory attendanceStudy-guide based testsKind but hard to follow
  • Students , but many cannot hear or understand lectures.
  • Grades depend heavily on tests, often based closely on study guides or sample tests.
  • Getting an A is possible with focused test prep, but the course feels frustrating and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is reachable because , but and perform well on a few major tests.

, while the only online review reports hard grading and an F.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The material is made harder by quiet, hard-to-follow lectures and frequent comments about needing to teach yourself.

The in-person reviews provide most evidence of lecture difficulty, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

as mandatory, with students saying missing or leaving early can lead to being dropped.

The ; the online review does not clearly discuss attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

31/100

because lectures are hard to hear and the class depends heavily on tests.

Both formats are negative, but the the larger count.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and sometimes disputed, though some students say tests are fair if study guides are mastered.

Format shift

The online review calls him a hard grader, while but .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report lots of , and sometimes a group project.

Format shift

Heavy workload ; the online review does not clearly describe workload beyond tests.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students often call him kind, but repeated comments about mumbling, low volume, and .

Format shift

, while the online review only says the teacher made a difference negatively.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are mainly based on tests, with many comments describing few graded items and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

Both formats mention tests, but depending on tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe a kind professor whose quiet lectures, strict attendance, and .

Main concern

Students often struggle to hear or understand lectures.

What students said

“You will not be able to hear him at all if you sit anywhere in the back like I did.”
MATH140
“if you miss 3 classes, or even leave early without consulting .”
MATH140
“ .”
MATH140

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review describes hard grading and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“He is a . .”
MATH140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually test-heavy and often study-guide based, but reviews .

Study-Guide Based TestsEssay-Based TestsTest HeavyFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

study guides or sample tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Study-Guide Based TestsTest HeavyFew Graded Items
“The though...”
MATH140
“Use/study the sample test because they are the exact same as the tests.”
MATH140

Online

The , but it does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Essay-Based Tests
“ .”
MATH140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Never learned anything because I could not hear or understand what he was saying. He was a nice guy but his class was awful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“He is very hard to understand, I sat in the front row and still had a hard time.”

📚 Grade Strategy

55/100

“The , and might be hard, but long as you study the material, you'll be able to get an A.”

⚠️

10/100

“if you miss 3 classes, or even leave early without consulting .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • VERY VERY VERY soft spoken and has an accent.
  • He mumbles a lot, so make sure you get a seat in the front.
  • He was a nice guy but his class was awful.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Grades off of tests mainly and just make sure to follow along with OLI.
  • .
  • He assigns a lot of homework but gives you very little credit for it.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Agassi is a sweet guy most of the time.
  • Overall, he's an okay teacher who really cares for the students and loves Statistics.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across several years show a consistent , and mandatory attendance.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH1409 reviews
STATS1403 reviews
MATH140216491 review
STATISTICS1401 review
STATS1361 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1