AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cherie Choate

CALC211 · MATH059 · MATH211 · MATH70 · MATH60 · MATH58 · MATH070 · MATH060 · MATH058 · 79 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take Cherie Choate only if you can handle a heavy math workload and already have strong study discipline.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy homeworkTest heavyPolarizing teacherStrict gradingWorks for disciplined students
  • Students overwhelmingly agree the , and tests.
  • Teaching reviews are polarized, with some praising her clarity and care while .
  • Success appears possible for disciplined students with strong time management, but many warn struggling math students away.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students repeatedly say an A , and strong math ability.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math content is often described as fast, demanding, and unless students already have a solid foundation.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe challenging course demands.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Several , and staying on schedule are necessary to pass.

All attendance and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Despite some strong praise, many students warn others away because the workload, tests, and teaching style can be punishing.

All recommendation evidence is in person, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Many students call her a tough or , though some say she gives chances, , or leniency in certain classes.

Format shift

, and it is mixed but leans strict.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

as daily, excessive, required, and capable of dominating students' time.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison available.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students call her excellent and caring, but , and needing to teach themselves.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person, and the large sample is strongly polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews emphasize tests, quizzes, and weight.

Format shift

All assessment evidence is in person, and exams plus quizzes appear central.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All reviews are in person and show a consistent heavy-workload class with sharply divided views on teaching quality.

Main concern

The workload and or have limited time.

What students said

“ like 90% of your grade hw is only worth 5%”
MATH060
“This is not a class that you can get an easy A in”
MATH211
“This class has so much work when it comes .”
MATH070

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam structure is test- and quiz-heavy with strict preparation demands, but reviews .

Test HeavyQuiz HeavyHomework PrerequisiteRetake QuizzesPrevious Exams As Study Guides

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring policies.

Test HeavyQuiz HeavyHomework PrerequisiteRetake QuizzesPrevious Exams As Study Guides
“test are like 90% of your grade hw is only worth 5%”
MATH060
“Majority of the class got an F on the ”
MATH070
“ as a studyguide”
MATH211

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is not a class that you can get an easy A in, but if you do all your homework, check your answers (get solution manual!), and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment pressure. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“This class has so much work when it comes .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She has absolutely no structure to her lectures.”

⚖️

25/100

“Shes a very hard and .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • A lot of homework, but it is only beneficial at the end (given that you actually do it).
  • Way too much homework for any full-time student, terrible lectures, and merciless tests.
  • I put in 4 hours a day 5 to 6 days a week just to keep up its a damn joke.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and will clarify further if asked.
  • She just goes through the book examples and just writes them on the board without explaining much.
  • Mrs. Choate helped me better understand math.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is not a class that you can get an easy A in
  • If you slack you will suffer!
  • Majority of the class got an F on the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

79

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

and consistent pattern about heavy workload, difficult assessments, and polarized teaching quality.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 512
3 out of 58
2 out of 511
1 out of 516

Course coverage

MATH06018 reviews
MATH07014 reviews
MATH2116 reviews
MATH0583 reviews
MATH0593 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH602 reviews
MATH702 reviews
CALC2111 review
MATH581 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1