AI Rate Professor

Fire Technology

D. Hebert

FT101 · FIRE8276 · FT106 · FIRETECH · FT104 · FIRETECH109 · FIRE · FTEC104 · FT102 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take him only if you can handle inconsistent instruction and are .

Best fit · Self Taught ProInconsistent ExperiencePoor FeedbackAccessible At TimesConfusing TestsFire Tech Knowledge
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with strong praise from some students and severe criticism from others.
  • The main , and confusion in assignments or tests.
  • Online-related experiences .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades may be attainable and As, but , and test mistakes can make the path unreliable.

The single online review sounds frustrating, while and grade-risk complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The content itself may not be extremely hard, but poor clarity and mismatched materials can make it feel difficult.

Online evidence points to busy textbook-based work, while and confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and online-related comments imply work .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends heavily on the section because students describe both a helpful expert and a .

The one , while in-person-classified reviews are strongly divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some comments suggest easy grades, but others report test errors and needing to correct mistakes to get deserved credit.

Format shift

and negative, while in-person-classified evidence is mixed.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The , and textbook reading, while other reviews focus more on confusion than volume.

Format shift

Online workload is clearly structured and recurring, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with several , and mistakes despite some strong praise.

Format shift

Online evidence is negative, and in-person-classified evidence ranges from excellent support to very poor instruction.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews , and papers, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes quizzes and discussion boards, while in-person-classified , and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person-classified reviews are highly mixed, with some praising clarity and access while , and confusion.

Main concern

Instruction quality and .

What students said

“ .”
FIRE
“His course is very well put together.”
FIRE8276
“Has .”
FTEC104

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The one online review is very negative, citing weekly , and unhelpful notes.

Main concern

Online materials and as poor.

What students said

“This has been without a doubt the worst fire tech class I have ever taken!”
FT106
“The PowerPoints with "notes" are useless since nothing in those notes have anything to do with the questions in the quizzes.”
FT106

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is inconsistent, with weekly quizzes and test-quality complaints but open-book rules.

Weekly quizzesTests with alleged incorrect answersExam policy unclearReviews do not clearly prove proctoring or book rules

Assessment risk

Varies

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and incorrect answers, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or book rules.

TestsMultiple incorrect answers allegedExam policy unclear
“Has .”
FTEC104
“it hard if you don't know what you got wrong on HW.”
FIRE

Online

The online review mentions weekly quizzes after discussion boards and textbook reading, but .

Weekly quizzesDiscussion boards before quizzesExam policy unclear
“we have a and reading the textbook.”
FT106

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Risk

42/100

“ .”

🧾

35/100

“He never gave me any feedback on any of the work I did”

👍 Positive Counterpoint

45/100

“His course is very well put together.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He knows his stuff and .
  • , and constantly helps when there is a need.
  • its like he wasnt even there.

Theme 2

⚖️ and Tests

  • and so on.
  • Has .
  • he gave everyone As onthe paper though.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • This has been without a doubt the worst fire tech class I have ever taken!
  • .
  • and was always able .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews span many years, but the evidence is mixed and some format labels conflict with comment wording.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

FT1012 reviews
FIRE1 review
FIRE82761 review
FIRETECH1 review
FIRETECH1091 review
Show 4 more courses
FT1021 review
FT1041 review
FT1061 review
FTEC1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1