AI Rate Professor

Science

Kim Miller

BIOLOGY102 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can independently handle technical biology content with little instructional support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedToo TechnicalTest HeavyUnpreparedAvoid
  • The only student review is strongly negative and says the professor was unprepared and scattered.
  • The course is described as too technical for the class level, with poor breakdown of concepts.
  • and risky, with the reviewer earning an F and recommending avoidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

The only reviewer earned an F and says students would need expert-level knowledge to pass.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The content is described as overly technical, full of large Latin science terms, and poorly broken down for beginners.

All course difficulty evidence comes from the in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

The tag says skipping class means you will not .

Only the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student explicitly recommends avoiding the professor because the class felt disorganized and too technical.

The recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

The F grade and test-heavy structure suggest strict outcome risk, though .

Format shift

Only the in-person review supports this judgment.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The , but and dense technical material create a heavy study burden.

Format shift

Only the in-person review mentions assessment pressure.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

The reviewer says she seemed unprepared, scattered, and too technical to teach the course effectively.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

The review tags the course as test heavy and graded by few things.

Format shift

Only the in-person review provides assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The technical, and hard to pass.

Main concern

Students may need expert-level background to keep up.

What students said

“Prof Miller was all over the place.”
BIOLOGY102
“You'd have to be an expert to pass”
BIOLOGY102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course appears test heavy, but reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Test HeavyGraded By Few Things

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The but does not clearly prove specific exam rules.

Test HeavyGraded By Few Things
“Graded by few things”
BIOLOGY102
“Test heavy”
BIOLOGY102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Prof Miller was all over the place.”

📈 Difficulty Risk

10/100

“You'd have to be an expert to pass”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Did not seem prepared.
  • She seemed like she knew the subject very well but was way too technical in trying to teach it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of big latin science names with no background or breakdown of subtopics.
  • You'd have to be an expert to pass

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so the warning is specific but not broadly verified.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BIOLOGY1021 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values