AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

John Suh

MATH140 · M103 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you can learn the material independently and , and strict grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesLots of homeworkTough gradingTest heavyPoor course management
  • Most students describe lectures as confusing and .
  • MATH140 is repeatedly described as homework-heavy and test-heavy.
  • One positive algebra review says he can be amusing and straightforward, but it is outweighed by strong negative reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

A few tests may be easy or definition-based, but , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

33/100

The material becomes challenging mainly because and students report .

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person MATH140 and M103 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students would not recommend him because the , and .

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with four of five reviews strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students repeatedly call him a tough or , and one review says he is not afraid to fail students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Multiple reviews emphasize lots of , and frequent exams.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most students and his answers to questions do not help.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and the dominant tone is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews mention frequent , and some quizzes.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and harsh grading.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves because .

What students said

“He gives long, boring, and .”
MATH140
“Lots and lots of .”
MATH140
“He's a and isn't afraid to fail you.”
MATH140

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention frequent exams and definition-focused tests, but they do not .

Frequent ExamsDefinition-Based TestsPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe frequent exams, definition-based tests, and pop quizzes, but .

Frequent ExamsDefinition-Based TestsPop Quizzes
“ and a half”
MATH140
“His tests are 12 vocab and 12 math”
MATH140
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
M103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Possibly one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“When you ask questions, his explanations end up causing more confusion.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Lots and lots of .”

⚖️

20/100

“He's a and isn't afraid to fail you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He gives long, boring, and .
  • He does not explain anything that he writes on the board.
  • He contradicts himself on his lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • and a half
  • because they are mostly definitions.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • .
  • Don't know take John Suh for Math 140!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews are fairly detailed and consistent, but the sample is small and mostly from older MATH140 sections.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1404 reviews
M1031 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1