AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Carolina Bonitatis

COUNS150 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a supportive, low-stress student success class with engaging assignments.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringEngaging AssignmentsBeginner FriendlySupportive Feedback
  • Students describe her as genuinely caring and highly supportive.
  • Assignments are engaging and not difficult.
  • Evidence is very positive but based .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

85/100

Getting a strong grade appears easy because the assignments were described as engaging and not difficult.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

The course appears beginner-friendly because the work was described as not difficult and supportive.

Only the in-person section has evidence, so no format difference can be proven.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does .

The single , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

The student strongly recommends her because , and makes assignments engaging.

The recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

because the assignments were described as not difficult, but no grade data was provided.

Format shift

Only one in-person review supports this; there is .

Workload

Light

82/100

Workload appears light because the student said the assignments were engaging and not difficult.

Format shift

This .

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Teaching quality appears excellent because the student emphasized genuine care, help, and an enjoyable teaching style.

Format shift

The strong teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The only assessment evidence mentions assignments, with .

Format shift

The ; there is no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The and easy assignments.

Main concern

The main limitation is that the evidence comes from only one older review.

What students said

“She seemed like she genuinely cared about her students and wanted to help them as much as she could.”
COUNS150
“ and not difficult to do.”
COUNS150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring policy, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I absolutely loved her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“She seemed like she genuinely cared about her students and wanted to help them as much as she could.”

📘 Workload

82/100

“ and not difficult to do.”

👍 Recommendation

92/100

“I absolutely loved her class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She seemed like she genuinely cared about her students and wanted to help them as much as she could.
  • She loved her teaching style and class!

Theme 2

📚 About Assignments

  • and not difficult to do.
  • I absolutely loved her class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review and it is from 2019, though it is detailed and consistent.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COUNS1501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values