AI Rate Professor

Communication

Jermaine Junius

COMMS105 · COM105 · COMS120 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him if you want supportive speech coaching, but if unclear structure and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring CoachPresentation GrowthParticipation HeavyPolarizing Structure
  • Two reviews strongly praise his support, especially for students anxious about speeches.
  • , and surprise outside volunteer work.
  • Grades can be favorable, but participation, speeches, and a few major items matter.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Grades appear attainable because students report A-level outcomes and one says everyone received 100 percent on the first speech grade.

All Easy A evidence comes from in person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course seems manageable for non-majors, but speeches, participation, and .

Only in person reviews are available, with mixed comments on structure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Participation matters and one tag says skipping class means you will not pass, so .

The and comments.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and helpful, but one review is strongly negative about organization and clarity.

All recommendation evidence comes from in person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Despite a tough grader tag, comments and and attainable A-range outcomes.

Format shift

Only in person reviews discuss grades.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not described as constant, but , and outside volunteer work can matter.

Format shift

Workload evidence is entirely from in person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

75/100

He is praised as caring and effective for speech improvement, but one and unfocused.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes from in person reviews and is mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Assessment appears based on speeches, participation, projects, and .

Format shift

Only in person reviews mention assessment types.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person reviews are polarized, with most praising his care and while and late requirements.

Main concern

The and heavy reliance on participation or major graded items.

What students said

“he was able to help me get through the speeches getting better at each one!”
COM105
“Hates answering question with specific direction.”
COMS120
“I improved so much thanks to this class.”
COMMS105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a traditional exam format, proctoring policy, open-book policy, midterm, or .

SpeechesParticipationFinal Volunteer WorkFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews mention speeches, participation, group projects, and outside volunteer work, but .

SpeechesParticipationFinal Volunteer WorkFew Graded Items
“OUTSIDE volunteer work as part of the final”
COMS120
“Graded by few things”
COMS120
“On our very first speech, we received a grade on how we did and what we needed to improve”
COMMS105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I improved so much thanks to this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

75/100

“he was able to help me get through the speeches getting better at each one!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“ .”

⚖️

72/100

“he gave us all 100% as our actual grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doctor Junius was honestly the studies.
  • Really nice and caring person!!
  • Hates answering question with specific direction.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He's amazing and faily easy.
  • he gave us all 100% as our actual grade.
  • You won't need EC!

Theme 3

🧩 About Class Structure

  • Participation matters
  • Graded by few things
  • OUTSIDE volunteer work as part of the final

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Three detailed in person reviews show useful but polarized evidence, with a small sample size.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COM1051 review
COMMS1051 review
COMS1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values