AI Rate Professor

Physics

Corinna Jobe

ASTRO100 · PHYS220 · ASTRO102 · PHYS110 · PHYS201 · ASTR101 · ASTRO110 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a and are willing to study seriously for exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and helpfulHard examsClear lecturesExtra credit and curvesTest heavy
  • Most students praise Jobe as , and willing to help in office hours.
  • The course content is manageable with study, but .
  • Grades are helped by curves, , dropped scores, and partial credit, though not every class felt lenient.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

An A is realistic with , and , but exams are too hard for this to be an effortless A.

Online evidence is limited to one work-heavy review, while in-person reviews show more support from curves, , and dropped grades.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material is understandable with her help, but physics and and problem-solving.

Both formats describe study-based success, with learning and test pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance appears important because quizzes, lectures, and in-class examples are tied to success, but .

and needing class, while the single online review gives no attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because she teaches clearly, cares, and helps students recover from difficult material.

The online review is mildly positive, while and a few sharp negative outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Grading often includes curves, , dropped scores, and partial credit, but some and harsh outcomes.

Format shift

, while the online review only mentions .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and exam study, with several students saying it is long or a lot of work but usually useful.

Format shift

The online review directly says it is a lot of work, and , and heavy exams.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most comments describe her as , and helpful, despite a few older reviews calling her unhelpful or inconsistent.

Format shift

, while the single online review mainly confirms she helps if asked.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades appear heavily driven by exams, finals, quizzes, and and labs supporting learning.

Format shift

Both formats mention tests or test-quizzes, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about her teaching and help, but repeatedly warn that .

Main concern

The main concern is difficult, exam-heavy grading that rewards preparation.

What students said

“ and long but she gives study guides.”
PHYS220
“ but fair and are closely related to the review and in class examples”
PHYS201
“Be prepared for some hard learning though!”
PHYS220

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review says the course is work-heavy but passable with studying and .

Main concern

The and test-quiz studying.

What students said

“Took her online course, it is a lot of work but as long as you study for the !”
ASTRO110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews consistently describe exams as important and often hard or long, with some student-friendly , and partial credit.

Hard ExamsLong ExamsTimed ExamsStudy GuidesCurved Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

43/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but do not clearly prove closed-book policy or proctoring rules.

Hard ExamsLong ExamsTimed ExamsStudy GuidesCurved Exams
“she gives you almost no time for your tests!!”
ASTR101
“ and long but she gives study guides.”
PHYS220
“Class is and final.”
PHYS220

Online

The online review mentions test-quizzes but does not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, open-book policy, Lockdown Browser, or .

Test-Quizzes
“as long as you study for the !”
ASTRO110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Jobe was honestly one of . At the beginning of this semester, I had been in tears because . However, her teaching style and office hours made everything make much more sense and I ended up with an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She takes the time to help you understand, and to start applying the material right away to get it to sink in better.”

📈 Effort For Grades

63/100

“If you study for the much that simple, especially since she grades on a curve.”

📝

43/100

“Most students don't finish the because while.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and neat!
  • She has plenty of office hours and is easy to understand.
  • Great teacher. but helpful.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • She gave us about 13 points of , and .
  • but helpful.
  • but fair and are closely related to the review and in class examples

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • she gives you almost no time for your tests!!
  • Absolutely terrible. and doesn't help students at all.
  • She yelled at me when I asked a simple question and made me feel stupid in front of a few other people.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The 19 reviews span many years and courses with , and study-based success.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHYS2206 reviews
ASTR1014 reviews
PHYS2013 reviews
ASTRO1022 reviews
ASTRO1102 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ASTRO1001 review
PHYS1101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1