AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

McKale Antonious

MATH102 · MATH240 · MATH70 · MATH103 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take him if you want a and and classroom rules.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOutstanding math teacherClear explanationsStrict attendance rulesCaring and funnyLearning-focused
  • Students consistently describe him as one of .
  • The course is understandable and rewarding, but attendance and classroom rules matter.
  • Grades look very reachable for students who attend, pay attention, and do the homework.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very reachable if you attend, pay attention, and do the homework, but it is not a free pass.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Students and not hard, though the material can still be challenging.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and punctuality are repeatedly treated as required for success.

The .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because he makes math understandable, exciting, and supportive.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Grades appear fair and attainable for students who complete homework and follow expectations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload centers on attendance, attention, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe his lectures as , and unusually effective for math.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Reviews emphasize homework, participation, and class engagement, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students strongly praise his math teaching, humor, care, and ability to make hard material understandable.

Main concern

You must attend, arrive on time, and .

What students said

“Honestly the ”
MATH103
“He makes math easy.”
MATH102
“NO PHONES, NO CALCULATER, DO NOT DO NOT BE LATE, AND NEVER MISS A CLASS”
MATH70

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or rules.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly the ”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“One of the first professors where I actually understood math.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ and I recommend him 100%.”

📌

18/100

“Don't show up late and keep your phone in your bag.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes math easy.
  • He will slow down for you when you need help.
  • he cares and his lectures are not hard at all.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Effort

  • Attend class, pay attention and do the homework and you will pass.
  • He is fair but he expects you to follow his rules.

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Experience

  • !!!.
  • Truly the best Professor I had at College of the Canyons.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed, consistent in-person reviews support the conclusions, but the sample is small and older.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1022 reviews
MATH1031 review
MATH2401 review
MATH701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values