AI Rate Professor

Art History

Tim Wright

ART11089935 · ART110 · ART111 · ART112 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can study independently from PowerPoints and handle grades based on few assessments.

Best fit · Self Taught ProExam HeavyPowerPoint BasedFew Grade ItemsMixed Online QualityClear When Engaged
  • Reviews are mixed, with one strong praise for clarity and several complaints about PowerPoint-heavy teaching.
  • Grades depend on few assessments, so .
  • Online reviews are slightly easier but criticize weak PowerPoints and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible, especially online, but few grade items and .

Online reviews suggest easier passing, while and few assignments can damage the grade.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The subject is manageable for interested students, but weak online materials and lecture-heavy delivery increase the challenge.

Online difficulty comes from poor PowerPoints and quizzes, while and note-heavy lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not show a , though online participation matters and in-person lectures appear important.

Online evidence mentions participation, while but does not prove a strict rule.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendation depends on learning style because some students praise him, while others dislike the PowerPoint-heavy and .

Online reviews are mildly mixed, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

because several reviews say the course has few grade items and no room .

Format shift

Online grading depends on quizzes and discussions, while and less forgiving.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is not huge, but , and exam study make it steady.

Format shift

Online workload centers on reading, quizzes, and discussions, while , and exams.

Teaching experience

Average

53/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with praise for clarity in one class but .

Format shift

Online students criticize course materials, while and poor lecture delivery.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Assessment leans toward exams and , and few grade opportunities.

Format shift

Online assessment uses quizzes and discussions, while , and a few assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized, with one calling the class fantastic and and lecture style.

Main concern

The main concern is that few major assessments control the grade.

What students said

“ so if you bomb that you're screwed for the rest of the semester.”
ART111
“ .”
ART11089935
“ and has a way of making things stick in your mind.”
ART112

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews say the class can be manageable, but PowerPoints and .

Main concern

The main concern is that online materials are not built well for independent learning.

What students said

“ and some have wrong images.”
ART111
“His online class is not very good and .”
ART111
“Professor Wright is good about getting back to you if you have any questions or concerns.”
ART110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam structure is standard but high-risk because , and no test makeups.

MidtermsFinalQuizzesFew Grade ItemsNo Makeup Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and no test makeups, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book policy.

MidtermsFinalNo Test Makeups
“ so if you bomb that you're screwed for the rest of the semester.”
ART111
“ .”
ART11089935
“Midterms 25 mult choice and essay question, Final 50 mult choice, no essay.”
ART112

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and discussions, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, .

QuizzesDiscussionsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Grade comes from 2 things: quizzes and discussions.”
ART111
“ and some have wrong images.”
ART111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ so if you bomb that you're screwed for the rest of the semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

53/100

“ and has a way of making things stick in your mind.”

📌 Assessment Risk

72/100

“Grade comes from 2 things: quizzes and discussions.”

⚖️

32/100

“if you do bad or miss 1, your grade suffers.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Wright is good about getting back to you if you have any questions or concerns.
  • He doesn't teach, just reads off a
  • and has a way of making things stick in your mind.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • You don't need to read the textbook to pass!
  • There are about only 5 credit earning assignments in this class
  • .

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams And Quizzes

  • and some have wrong images.
  • so if you bomb that you're screwed for the rest of the semester.
  • Midterms 25 mult choice and essay question, Final 50 mult choice, no essay.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across online and , but several are old and opinions vary widely.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART1113 reviews
ART1101 review
ART110899351 review
ART1121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values