AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Kyle Gatlin

SURVEY101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

Avoid Kyle Gatlin unless you can learn surveying mostly on your own and only need a manageable pass.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesImpatientEasy to passMath-heavyTest heavy
  • Two of three reviews are strongly negative about communication and professionalism.
  • The class may be easy to pass, but that does .
  • One positive review says the lab is manageable if students do the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The course seems passable with effort, but there is not enough grade evidence to call it an easy A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The class is not described as hard to pass, but the math-heavy material and .

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person Survey 101 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

policy, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

because they describe unclear teaching, impatience, and poor treatment of struggling students.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, but one student says the class is not hard to pass if you put in the work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

56/100

Workload appears moderate because students mention math and tests, but not an overwhelming amount of assignments.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload and testing.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Teaching quality is weak because , and serious professionalism concerns.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Assessment appears test-heavy because the only and no assignment-heavy pattern is described.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, impatience, and serious concerns about treatment of struggling students.

Main concern

because lecture clarity and support are unreliable.

What students said

“Impatient and ”
SURVEY101
“Not a hard class to pass just have to put the work in.”
SURVEY101
“ .”
SURVEY101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest a test-heavy class, but they do not clearly prove the .

Test Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove specific exam format or rules.

Test Heavy
“A lot of math involved in this class.”
SURVEY101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Impatient and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, professionalism, and passability; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Impatient and ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ .”

📈 Difficulty & Passing

62/100

“Not a hard class to pass just have to put the work in.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Good teacher.
  • Impatient and
  • he has a tendency to slander struggling students by badmouthing them to the other instructors.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not a hard class to pass just have to put the work in.
  • A lot of math involved in this class.
  • If you want to learn surveying and he is the one teaching or co teaching a class the you need, you should take this class at another city college.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only 3 in-person reviews are available, though the negative pattern is still concerning.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

SURVEY1013 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3