AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Jerry Edmond

NCCAWT10D · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Consider taking him if you want an experienced and , but the evidence is thin.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExperiencedCaringInspirationalRecommended
  • The only review praises his long experience and supportive style.
  • Difficulty appears low, but .
  • Recommendation is positive, though based on one short comment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

The low difficulty rating suggests manageable effort, but there is no direct evidence that an A is easy.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course seems manageable from the low difficulty rating, but the comment gives little detail about content challenge.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Recommended because the reviewer highlights experience, care, and inspiration.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

There is , so as unknown rather than lenient.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

65/100

The low difficulty rating suggests a manageable workload, but the .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

The review credits his long experience and caring, inspirational presence.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not identify whether the course relies more on exams or assignments.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The and emphasizes experience.

Main concern

The review is .

What students said

“Forty years experience.”
NCCAWT10D

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Forty years experience.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Forty years experience.”

👍 Recommendation Signal

78/100

“Forty years experience.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Forty years experience.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Forty years experience.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one short review from 2017 with limited detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NCCAWT10D1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values