AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Regina Blasberg

SURV101 · SURVALL · CONST103 · SURVE101 · CONST101 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

She is a strong choice for surveying-focused students, but construction management students should check the course fit carefully.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOrganizedHelpfulDedicatedAccessibleProgram Preparation
  • Surveying students repeatedly praise her dedication, organization, and availability.
  • Construction-related reviews are much more negative about subject expertise and teaching fit.
  • The workload and difficulty look moderate, with useful labs and test preparation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Passing looks realistic with support and preparation, but the comments do not describe an effortless A.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

53/100

Surveying content is practical and supported by labs, but students still need preparation and trig background.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and help, though two construction reviews raise serious concerns.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and clear criteria, but there is not enough evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Labs and test preparation require steady work but are described as useful rather than overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most reviews praise her organization, availability, and dedication, while construction reviews criticize her teaching fit.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention labs, field notes, practice tools, and and exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and preparation, with notable complaints in construction courses.

Main concern

Course fit matters because construction reviews are weaker than surveying reviews.

What students said

“ and helpful.”
SURV101
“You couldn't ask for more dedication from an instructor.”
SURVALL
“she does not have what it takes to teach construction management.”
CONST101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention test preparation and take-home practice, but they do not clearly prove the .

Take-home practiceTest preparationExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a take-home practice, but not the .

Take-home practiceTest preparation
“helps preparation for tools necessary.”
SURV101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You couldn't ask for more dedication from an instructor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, course fit, and assessment. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“ and helpful.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“ !”

⚖️ Course Fit

58/100

“she does not have what it takes to teach construction management.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and helpful.
  • .
  • Regina's fully committed to promoting the industry and was a help at every stage.

Theme 2

🧪 About Labs and Tests

  • , techniques, and how to prepare proper field notes.
  • helps preparation for tools necessary.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Fit

  • she does not have what it takes to teach construction management.
  • I learned more about Printreading in the estimating course.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

67/100

Evidence confidence

and courses, but some are old and opinions differ by subject area.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SURV1012 reviews
CONST1011 review
CONST1031 review
SURVALL1 review
SURVE1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values