AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Gilbert Ramos

ANTHRO103L · ANTH101 · ANTHRO101 · ANTHRO220 · ANTHRO103 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take him if you want a memorable anthropology class and are , and prepare for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAmazing LecturesTest HeavyEngaging StoriesRead And Take NotesHard Tests
  • Students strongly praise Ramos as an engaging, funny, and intellectually memorable lecturer.
  • , and notes, with limited support.
  • There is only in-person evidence, and it shows both high enthusiasm and real test difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

61/100

Some students call it easy if you attend and take notes, but and limited keep the A from being automatic.

All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The lectures are engaging and clear, but detailed reading and .

Only in-person reviews describe course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Students repeatedly warn that skipping class or .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

, and insightful lectures despite the .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

46/100

, but test-heavy structure and little reduce leniency.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

There may be little homework, but , and study carefully for exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students consistently describe him as knowledgeable, funny, passionate, and unusually engaging.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

Reviews repeatedly describe the class as , and one essay.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews praise his energy, stories, and insight, but warn that and .

Main concern

The and little .

What students said

“READ READ READ”
ANTHRO101
“ !!”
ANTHRO101
“A .”
ANTHRO103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is significant because students describe hard, detail-focused, test-heavy assessment, but reviews .

Hard TestsTest HeavyQuizzes Or ExamsFew Grade Items

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly report hard and , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsTest HeavyDetail Focused
“ !!”
ANTHRO101
“this is basically a test-only class.”
ANTHRO101
“ .”
ANTHRO220

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Gil is by far my favorite professor iv'e ever had at COC.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“His lectures are always very interesting, fun and inquiring.”

🧪

42/100

“ tests.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's hilarious, always making lectures not only interesting but eye opening.
  • He actually Teaches, explains, shares life exp 4 deeper understanding of concepts.
  • Great professor and life mentor.

Theme 2

📚 About Work And Tests

  • READ READ READ
  • !!
  • Whatever is lectured is on the test.

Theme 3

❤️ About Class Impact

  • This class is offensive, uncomfortable, brilliant and should be mandatory for all students.
  • he teaches you about life!
  • His lectures are very interesting, very educating and fun!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 17 reviews are detailed, consistent on teaching quality, and .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTHRO1016 reviews
ANTHRO1035 reviews
1032 reviews
ANTH1012 reviews
ANTHRO103L1 review
Show 1 more courses
ANTHRO2201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1