AI Rate Professor

English

Andy McCutcheon

ENGLISH091 · ENG091 · HUMAN100 · ENGL102 · HUM100 · ENGL260 · ENG102 · ENG126 · ENG8375 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENG90 · ENG261 · ENG103 · ENG91 · ENGLI091 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a lively English professor who rewards steady work and gives students room to succeed.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging and funnyFlexible deadlinesExtra creditReading and writing heavyHelpful feedback
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as engaging, helpful, flexible, and .
  • The , and discussion work, especially in English courses.
  • Grades are usually reachable through steady work, , rewrites, or flexible policies, though a few .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Getting an A is very achievable if students complete the , and , and flexibility.

Online reviews show doable work with some grading complaints, while flexibility, and easy A potential.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The material is manageable and often enjoyable, but , and critical thinking keep it from being effortless.

Online humanities reviews sound easier, while and writing demands.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

76/100

Several students describe flexibility with late work and attendance, but policies are not consistently detailed across all courses.

In-person reviews give stronger evidence of attendance and late-work flexibility, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and makes English feel approachable.

Both formats are mostly positive, though online has a small cluster of and clarity.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

He is not always an , but , rewrites, higher-grade choices, and flexibility make grading student-friendly overall.

Format shift

In-person reviews emphasize rewrites and late work, while online and a few harsh grading complaints.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is manageable but includes lots of , and occasional busy work.

Format shift

Online reviews mention regular written assignments and discussions, while , and sometimes heavy workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students describe him as funny, engaging, helpful, passionate, and effective at improving writing, despite a few complaints about clarity.

Format shift

Both formats show strong teaching praise, but the few harsh clarity complaints come from online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment appears centered , and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both online and in-person evidence , and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly praise his humor, support, relaxed style, and , while , and occasional heavy workload.

Main concern

Students who want a very light English class may dislike the reading, essays, and workload.

What students said

“ ! and as well!”
ENG103
“He gives a heavy workload and grades pretty rough, but you will learn.”
ENGL102
“ , and willing to help you at all costs.”
ENG102

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive and , and flexibility, but two students report unclear instructions and harsh grading.

Main concern

A minority of online students felt essay expectations and .

What students said

“ . McCutcheon for all of my online classes.”
ENG261
“As long as you do all the .”
HUMAN100
“ and he makes excuses for them not being accurate.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mostly describe writing assignments, discussions, and projects instead of exams, and .

No Tests MentionedEssaysResearch PaperDiscussionsMultimedia Project

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

literature course, and no tests in another course, so exam policy varies and strict rules are not proven.

EssaysResearch PaperNo Tests MentionedStandard Tests Mentioned
“Assigns a lot of reading. No tests.”
096
“The class is informal, but the tests and .”
ENG260
“Research paper, 2 discussions and .”
ENG261

Online

Online reviews mention written assignments, essays, discussions, papers, and a multimodal project, but do not clearly prove webcam, .

Written AssignmentsEssaysDiscussionsMultimodal Project
“The very fun and it all about creativity.”
HUMAN100
“four days we had a and over the weekend we had an ”
ENG101
“There is a paper and a , but it is so extremely easy!”
HUM100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can!”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and flexibility; credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

88/100

“He Rocks! Teaches you how to break down literature and the writing process so that writing is no longer a dreaded task but effortless and fun, yes I said FUN.”

Recommendation Rate

91/100

“If you have the ! .”

78/100

“He offers and allows students to do 2 rewrites out of 4 essays!”

Theme 1

About Teaching Style

  • , and willing to help you at all costs.
  • He was really engaging and truly brought the texts to life.
  • Excellent professor very laid back and will help you with your essays.

Theme 2

About Workload and Grades

  • Research paper, 2 discussions and .
  • As long as you do all the .
  • He gives a heavy workload and grades pretty rough, but you will learn.

Theme 3

About Flexibility

  • and an overall cool guy.
  • Lenient if you have justified problems with due dates.
  • allows late work to be turned in whenever.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 37 reviews cover both online and many years.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 58
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1017 reviews
ENG1025 reviews
ENG2613 reviews
0962 reviews
ENG0912 reviews
Show 14 more courses
ENG1032 reviews
ENGL1022 reviews
ENGLI0912 reviews
HUMAN1002 reviews
1051 review
158311 review
ENG1261 review
ENG83751 review
ENG901 review
ENG911 review
ENGL1011 review
ENGL2601 review
ENGLISH0911 review
HUM1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1