AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Monica Dabos

STATS140H · STATS140 · MATH140H · MATH140 · MATH075 · HMATH140 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Monica Dabos is a good choice if you can handle group work and occasional clarity issues while staying active in class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and helpfulGroup work heavyAccent barrierLow homeworkExtra credit
  • Most students describe her as caring and willing to help.
  • The main complaints are accent, handwriting, organization, and .
  • Grades can be strong for students who attend, participate, and keep up with the material.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

A high grade is realistic with attendance and participation because , and several A or A+ outcomes.

All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The math content can be challenging, but many students say she makes it understandable when they attend and participate.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person math and statistics reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

because participation and in-class work matter, though one review says missing class did not prevent an A.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and helpful, but the accent and organization issues make her a bad fit for some learners.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Many students earned A or A+ grades, and reviews , and low homework despite some tough-grader complaints.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

Students repeatedly say there is little homework, though group work and .

Format shift

All workload evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

She is often described as caring, helpful, and good at making math understandable, but accent and organization reduce consistency.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention tests, homework, group work, participation, and , with no single method fully dominating.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and grade outcomes, but several warn that her accent, handwriting, and organization can make math harder.

Main concern

because of accent, handwriting, or .

What students said

“ , and goes above and beyond to help her students.”
MATH075
“There is ”
MATH140
“Her structure is really sloppy and .”
STATS140

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe standard in-person tests that can be easy with preparation but .

Difficult Tests If UnpreparedExtra Credit OpportunitiesTests Related To Homework

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, or closed-book policies.

Difficult Tests If UnpreparedExtra Credit OpportunitiesTests Related To Homework
“ if you don't understand material.”
MATH140
“A few opportunities were given.”
STATS140H
“if you .”
STATS140

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and goes above and beyond to help her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She made the subject understandable.”

📈 Grade Value

78/100

“There is ”

⚠️ Clarity Concern

58/100

“Her structure is really sloppy and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She will not move on until everyone understands the material and really .
  • She made the subject understandable.
  • She teaches the class differently but in a good way.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Doesn't give a ton of
  • Pay attention and you'll definitely pass!
  • if you don't understand material.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Clarity Issues

  • Heavy accent along with terrible hand writing.
  • and confusing.
  • The

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 13 detailed in-person reviews show repeated patterns in , and concerns.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1406 reviews
STATS1403 reviews
HMATH1401 review
MATH0751 review
MATH140H1 review
Show 1 more courses
STATS140H1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 4 · A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values