AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Russel Sander

PHILOS106 · PHILOS101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can handle strict rules, heavy structure, and a blunt classroom style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict classroom rulesHeavy assignmentsPolarizing teachingTough grading
  • Students report and electronics rules.
  • and dismissive.
  • Workload can be heavy, but both reported grades were A-range.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

A-range grades are possible, but , and grading frustration.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content itself is not described as conceptually brutal, but the structure and workload make the class demanding.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

because missing class can cost daily credit.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Recommendation is weak because , and discussion style.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

, while another earned an A with strict expectations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The , and an essay.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

48/100

Teaching quality is highly split between excellent instruction and complaints about dismissive behavior.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and a major essay.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

heavy rules and mixed teaching quality.

Main concern

Strict attendance, electronics, and many students.

What students said

“He does not allow any electronics in class, if your phone goes off and he hears it, you lose a day's credit.”
PHILOS101
“20 multi-choice tests, 30+ discussion questions, and a 5 page essay.”
PHILOS106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention many tests and a five-page essay, but they do .

Many Multiple-Choice TestsEssay Assignment

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and an essay but do not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring.

Many Multiple-Choice TestsEssay Assignment
“20 multi-choice tests, 30+ discussion questions, and a 5 page essay.”
PHILOS106

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Yes, he is arrogant but he's an EXCELLENT professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and rules; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Yes, he is arrogant but he's an EXCELLENT professor.”

⚖️

25/100

“Professor Sanders does not grade based on the Rubrick he provides.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“20 multi-choice tests, 30+ discussion questions, and a 5 page essay.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and if you bring up a good counterpoint he will change the subject.
  • Yes, he is arrogant but he's an EXCELLENT professor.

Theme 2

📋 About Rules & Workload

  • He does not allow any electronics in class, if your phone goes off and he hears it, you lose a day's credit.
  • If you miss a class you lose a day's credit.
  • 20 multi-choice tests, 30+ discussion questions, and a 5 page essay.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and they sharply disagree on teaching quality.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHILOS1011 review
PHILOS1061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values