AI Rate Professor

Culinary Arts

Gevork Kazanchyan

CUART055 · CUL55 · CULIARTS055 · CULARCULA · CA055 · CUL6819 · CUL550 · CA05589466 · CULIN50 · 055CUL · CULAR055 · CULARTS055 · CERT1462 · CUL055 · CA0510 · CUL120 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a and can follow deadlines without needing much flexibility.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear expectationsKnowledgeableEntertaining lecturesFirm but fairStrict deadlines
  • Most students describe him as , and highly engaging.
  • The class is usually easy to pass if students follow guidelines, attend, and complete the few required tasks.
  • A minority found him condescending, strict, or too hands-off, especially around deadlines and self-study.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Getting a good grade is usually easy if students follow the syllabus, , and prepare for the final.

The online review says the certification test was tough, while are followed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The material is practical and often simple, but certification concepts and standards can still require studying.

Online evidence emphasizes a , while and clearly structured.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

and sometimes mandatory, but one review says roll may not be taken.

In-person reviews include conflicting attendance evidence, while the single .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

because students repeatedly praise his clarity, humor, knowledge, and practical experience.

Both formats are positive, but the recommendation evidence is much stronger in the 32 in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students often say following the syllabus leads to a good grade, though deadlines and project rules can be strict.

Format shift

, while the online review only says his teaching helped with a tough certification exam.

Workload

Light

78/100

Workload is usually light, often centered on a small number of , and a final.

Format shift

, while the online review does not give enough workload detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Most students call , and passionate, despite a few complaints about tone.

Format shift

Both online and adding more detail and a few negative exceptions.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment appears to mix assignments or than relying on one method only.

Format shift

The online review mentions an exam, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly praise his clarity, humor, real-world knowledge, and direct expectations, while some criticize strictness and tone.

Main concern

He can be strict, sarcastic, and unforgiving about deadlines or participation.

What students said

“Follow the guidelines you pass, don't and you dont pass.”
05589456
“It is so easy to pass this class. All you have to do is go, turn in one assignment and .”
CULIARTS055
“Kazanchyan gives absolutely no leeway .”
0558945

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review says his lectures clarified tough certification material and helped with the exam.

Main concern

The though his teaching helped.

What students said

“The but Gevork absolutely was incredible with his lecture”
CERT1462
“ and gave me great tips to be able to comprehend and get certified.”
CERT1462

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and finals are mentioned as important, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book status, proctoring, or .

Certification ExamFinal ExamProject-Based GradeReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and projects, but do not clearly prove open-book status or .

Final ExamProject-Based GradeReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy
“All you have to do is go, turn in one assignment and .”
CULIARTS055
“Your and project”
CUL055

Online

The online review says the certification test was tough but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Certification ExamReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy
“The ”
CERT1462

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Gev is a great teacher! Enthusiastic about really teaching the material so that you get it. He made class fun and interesting - but also expected you to perform to high standards.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and strictness. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“He made class fun and interesting - but also expected you to perform to high standards.”

📈 Grade Path

84/100

“Follow it to the letter and you will get a good grade.”

⚖️

78/100

“He's firm but fair.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He had stories that related to the material we were covering and made the class more interesting.
  • He makes an extraordinary effort to make the and make us laugh while doing it.
  • Gev is very knowledgeable, passionat AND entertaining.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It is so easy to pass this class. All you have to do is go, turn in one assignment and .
  • His syllabus is the bible. Follow it to the letter and you will get a good grade.
  • Professor was very professional,knowledgeable and approachable. Student completes the class with a sense of pride because he/she paid attention, took notes on everything, studied and received an A for excellent work.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Strictness

  • Kazanchyan gives absolutely no leeway .
  • You only get one day to be absent so be careful.
  • Very nasty to students as they read oral reports.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 33 reviews across several years show a consistent pattern of strong teaching with repeated notes on clarity, workload, and grading.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CUL0559 reviews
CULAR0556 reviews
CERT14622 reviews
CULARTS0552 reviews
05589451 review
Show 13 more courses
055894561 review
055CUL1 review
CA05101 review
CA0551 review
CA055894661 review
CUART0551 review
CUL1201 review
CUL551 review
CUL5501 review
CUL68191 review
CULARCULA1 review
CULIARTS0551 review
CULIN501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values