AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Athanasia Cholvin

GEOMETRYATCOC · MATH083 · MATH103 · GEOMETRY · MATH070 · MATH058 · MATH07092744 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless you can teach yourself math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing examsSelf-teaching requiredStrict attendanceHeavy homeworkPoor organization
  • , and students needing to teach themselves.
  • as , and not well aligned with preparation.
  • , and several students mention late starts or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A seems difficult because students describe , and many poor class outcomes.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The math content becomes hard because , and students report ending class lost.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

because multiple students mention attendance being taken twice.

Only in-person reviews mention attendance, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Most students strongly warn against taking her because they find the and support minimal.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students report , and one comment says most of the class received a C.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Workload is mixed, but the and frustrating assignments.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most comments describe poor explanations, disorganization, lateness, and students needing to teach themselves.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Students , and limited study guidance.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, with , and strict class policies.

Main concern

Students often feel lost and unsupported.

What students said

“you are better off just teaching yourself!”
MATH083
“ .”
GEOMETRY
“The amount of .”
070

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and student-unfriendly testing, with difficult exams, no curves, and .

Difficult ExamsNo Make-Up TestsNo CurvesNo Restroom During Test

Assessment risk

Strict

15/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly describe difficult and , but they do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book status.

Difficult ExamsNo Make-Up TestsNo CurvesNo Restroom During Test
“ and confusing”
MATH058
“ .”
GEOMETRY
“Don't ever miss a .”
MATH07092744

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Every person in the course dreads going to class because her style of teaching is so bad you are better off just teaching yourself!”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“She cannot teach and is very strict on department rules.”

⚖️

15/100

“Basically our entire class received a C.”

🧪

15/100

“ and confusing”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she takes it to a whole new level.
  • she seems to be all over the place and just writes things on the board without fully explaining them.
  • She is extremely hard to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The amount of .
  • .
  • .

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • .
  • !
  • Get out while you can!!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across several courses are highly consistent, though they are older and mostly lack detailed grade data.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH0702 reviews
MATH1032 reviews
0701 review
GEOMETRY1 review
GEOMETRYATCOC1 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH0581 review
MATH070927441 review
MATH0831 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values