AI Rate Professor

Biology

Becky Jacoby

BIO17792 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

if you can handle a tough anatomy course and will use office hours for help.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful Office HoursHard Anatomy CourseSupportive Lab Prep
  • The only review says the anatomy course was very hard but the professor gave meaningful help.
  • Lab practical support and long office hours are the strongest positive evidence.
  • There is too little evidence to judge exams, attendance, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A does not look easy because the only student reported high difficulty and earned a B+ after extra help.

All evidence comes from one Online review, with no In person reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The anatomy content appears challenging because the student said they were not ready for it and rated difficulty at the maximum.

Only the Online format has evidence, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

The , and there are no In person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

The review is positive about support, but the single comment and high difficulty make the recommendation cautious.

Recommendation evidence comes only from one Online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

because the review mentions a B+ and passing the lab practical but .

Format shift

Only the Online review is available, and .

Workload

Heavy

40/100

The workload seems heavy because the course was rated very difficult and and office hours.

Format shift

This workload judgment comes only from the Online review.

Teaching experience

Good

75/100

Teaching support looks strong because the professor's self-study sessions and office hours helped the student pass.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes only from one Online review.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

The review mentions a lab practical but does .

Format shift

Only the Online review mentions assessment, and the evidence is limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online evidence describes a very difficult anatomy course with and office hours.

Main concern

The course felt very difficult and demanding.

What students said

“Wasn't ready for it.”
BIO17792
“the self study sessions really paid off”
BIO17792
“she put in some long office hours with me”
BIO17792

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review mentions a lab practical, but reviews do not .

Lab Practical MentionedExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The Online review mentions a lab practical, but reviews do not clearly prove online exam policy, proctoring, webcam use, or open-book format.

Lab Practical MentionedOnline Exam Policy Unclear
“ ”
BIO17792

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“the self study sessions really paid off”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Support

75/100

“the self study sessions really paid off”

📈 Course Difficulty

35/100

“Wasn't ready for it.”

🧪

65/100

“she put in some long office hours with me”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • the self study sessions really paid off
  • she put in some long office hours with me

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty

  • Wasn't ready for it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one older review with limited academic detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIO177921 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values