AI Rate Professor

English

Richard McGinis

ENG306 · ENG101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take him only if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProInconsistent lecturesFair assignment timingOverlong discussionsLow clarity
  • and one strong warning.
  • Assignments appear manageable, but there is no .
  • The .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A does not look effortless because there is no and the navigate.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The workload sounds manageable, but and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

One student recommends him, but another gives a direct warning because of unclear and inconsistent teaching.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Reviews mention fair assignment time but no and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The course has three major assignments plus smaller work and a short group presentation.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

, and discussions that outlast their usefulness.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and a group presentation, but .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but serious problems with clarity and consistency.

Main concern

Lectures and .

What students said

“There are time to work on.”
ENG306
“All over the ...too bad because he's a nice guy, however it does not make up for his inconsistencies.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or book policy.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Five words... .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“All over the ...too bad because he's a nice guy, however it does not make up for his inconsistencies.”

⚖️ Workload Structure

58/100

“There are time to work on.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

42/100

“I enjoyed this class. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All over the ...too bad because he's a nice guy, however it does not make up for his inconsistencies.
  • Only thing I disliked was, how long class discussion lasted to the .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There are time to work on.
  • There was no .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they give mixed but limited detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1011 review
ENG3061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values