AI Rate Professor

English

Rebecca Kroll

ENGLISH94 · 101H · ENGLISH096 · ENG091 · ENGL091 · ENN91 · ENGL102 · 102H · ENG102 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENG91 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a supportive English teacher and are willing to write, participate, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful feedbackDiscussion heavyEssay focusedFair but inconsistent gradingWorkload depends on course
  • Many students find her kind, helpful, and .
  • , and steady writing effort.
  • Some students .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

An A is realistic with effort, participation, and revision, but .

Online reviews describe steady work with good support, while and grading concerns.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The material is usually manageable, but , and literary analysis can make it harder for uninterested students.

Online evidence emphasizes workload, while , and class discussion.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but participation and in-class discussion are central to success.

In-person reviews strongly emphasize participation, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and kindness, but some warn about boredom and .

Online reviews are clearly positive, while but more divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Several students call her fair or easy, but others report hard or .

Format shift

Online reviews do not complain about grading, while .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is manageable but , and group discussion.

Format shift

Online reviews mention several essays and , while in-person workload varies by course.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students often , and availability, but some find her boring or too professional.

Format shift

Online reviews praise responsiveness, while and classroom engagement concerns.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment , and participation more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize essays and and group discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but lean positive, with strong praise for help and clarity but complaints about boredom, participation, and .

Main concern

Students who dislike discussion, writing, or .

What students said

“She really ants everyone to get an A and honestly you will get it if you just give effort.”
101H
“Doesn't assign too much work but she grades hard on the essays.”
ENG102
“She makes the class fun IF YOU PARTICIPATE!”
ENGL091

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are very positive but , and .

Main concern

The online class requires steady writing work across the term.

What students said

“It was a lot of work (as expected), but not overload.”
ENG101
“ and always .”
ENGL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but and final were very easy while other reviews emphasize quizzes and essays.

Easy MidtermEasy FinalArticle QuizzesEssay Based

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one very easy midterm and final, but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

Easy MidtermEasy FinalArticle QuizzesEssay Based
“Her mid term and so easy didn't study and got an A.”
096
“Your quizzed on articles that were assigned in class.”
ENGLISH096

Online

Online reviews mention essays and homework but do not clearly prove .

Essay Based
“4 essays total over the semester”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She really ants everyone to get an A and honestly you will get it if you just give effort.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, separating online and in-person evidence while highlighting teaching, workload, participation, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“ . She is very sweet and encouraging.”

📈 Effort And Grades

64/100

“you will get it if you just give effort.”

⚖️

56/100

“She definitely grades easier on some students papers and is harder on other students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very helpful and kind teacher.
  • .
  • She is one of the sweetest professors ever!

Theme 2

✍️ About Workload

  • It was a lot of work (as expected), but not overload.
  • The but are never too unrealistic.
  • Doesn't assign too much work but she grades hard on the essays.

Theme 3

💬 About Participation

  • If you are shy and do not like .
  • She makes the class fun IF YOU PARTICIPATE!
  • English and without engaging students, you are not .

Theme 4

⚖️

  • she is a and that the material is fairly easy.
  • A though
  • I feel cheated from an A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

There are 25 reviews across multiple years and courses, with enough detail to show consistent strengths and recurring concerns.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGL1014 reviews
ENG1013 reviews
101H2 reviews
ENG912 reviews
ENGL0912 reviews
Show 9 more courses
ENGL1022 reviews
ENGLISH0962 reviews
ENGLISH942 reviews
0961 review
1021 review
102H1 review
ENG0911 review
ENG1021 review
ENN911 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values