AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Artin Parsanian

STATS140 · MATH058 · STATISTICS · MATH140 · STATS · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can teach yourself and are prepared for and strict attendance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized LecturesUnclear GradingHelpful When AskedMandatory AttendanceConfusing Tests
  • Reviews are sharply split, but most later statistics reviews describe unclear lectures, weak organization, and .
  • Math 058 students found him helpful and understandable, while Statistics and Math 140 students often warned others away.
  • , and students say missing or leaving early is marked.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students earned A or B grades, but comments , and weak preparation, so high grades are not low-effort.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The material may not always be advanced, but unclear lectures, skipped content, and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

and late arrivals or early departures are called out.

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most detailed reviews warn against taking him because , and lecture clarity are major problems.

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

as questionable, unclear, or incorrect despite some students passing with B grades.

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is not the main complaint, but tests.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

A few students praise his help, but , and incomplete teaching.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and grading, but do not prove that exams dominate the course.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews show a few positive basic math experiences but , and unclear grading in statistics and Math 140.

Main concern

Students may need to self-teach because lectures and .

What students said

“ .”
STATS
“ cover minimal information but are dragged a long for 2 and a half hours.”
MATH140
“ so we can understand it!”
MATH058

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Confusing TestsHomework Does Not Match TestsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and poor homework alignment, but exam rules are not clearly proven.

Confusing TestsHomework Does Not Match Tests
“ .”
STATS140
“The , and you need to look in your book to learn about each chapter.”
STATS

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ .”

⚖️

25/100

“ , and he really gives no clear explanations for the .”

🚪 Recommendation Risk

25/100

“ if you want to pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • .
  • so we can understand it!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • cover minimal information but are dragged a long for 2 and a half hours.
  • .
  • I passed with a B but have no idea how or what I was doing.

Theme 3

🚨 About Course Risk

  • Do yourself a favor and .
  • Stay away!
  • Awful teacher! Skipped the last few chapters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 11 detailed in-person reviews show a consistent negative pattern across several courses, despite older dates.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH0583 reviews
STATS1403 reviews
MATH1402 reviews
STATS2 reviews
STATISTICS1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values