AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Tony Barrios

BLUEPRINT103 · CONST104 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you are comfortable with a and mixed teaching quality.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConstruction knowledgeMixed lecturesHigh difficultyLow confidenceAvoid warnings
  • Positive reviews say he knows construction and .
  • Negative reviews are blunt and say not to take him or that students will not learn.
  • The small review count makes the overall picture unstable but clearly mixed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

One reported A exists, but difficulty ratings and .

All grade and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Students describe construction content as learnable but the class difficulty is often rated high.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Recommendation is mixed because some students learned, while others .

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

There is too little grade , and difficulty ratings lean demanding.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Reviews , but difficulty ratings suggest the class is not light.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

49/100

Some students found his explanations useful, but and claimed they learned nothing.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

Assessment and is vague.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are split between useful construction instruction and .

Main concern

Several students say the class is difficult or .

What students said

“He was able to explain the subject in a manner which made sense.”
CONST104
“ ”
103
“ .”
BLUEPRINT103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

49/100

“He was able to explain the subject in a manner which made sense.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

43/100

“ ”

📈 Difficulty

42/100

“I enjoyed his lectures. He was able to explain the subject in a manner which made sense.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I enjoyed his lectures.
  • He know s construction.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Learning Value

  • I learned a lot about construction.
  • I even learned how to do fractions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

, and they are short with sharply mixed opinions.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

1032 reviews
BLUEPRINT1032 reviews
CONST1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values