AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Steve Kroh

MATH60 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid Steve Kroh unless you can teach yourself math and do not need extra support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProKnowledgeable but unclearNo extra creditCondescending toneFast expectationsLow support
  • Reviews give limited but mostly negative evidence about teaching effectiveness.
  • Students say he is knowledgeable and straightforward, but support and .
  • No and quick expectations make the course unforgiving.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

No and weak support mean students likely need substantial independent study to earn an A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Math 60 is presented as manageable only if students can study chapters and examples independently.

Only in-person reviews provide course difficulty evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

The strongest detailed because his teaching methods and help style are poor.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Repeated no-extra-credit comments make grading feel .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload details are sparse, but students are told to study chapters and follow examples closely.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

He is described as knowledgeable, but comments criticize his teaching methods and condescending response to help requests.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews , so the assessment mix is uncertain.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as knowledgeable but hard to learn from, with no and limited patience for questions.

Main concern

Students may struggle if .

What students said

“Expects for his students to understand quickly, and can be very condescending if you ask for help.”
11326
“New teacher but knowledgeable, very straight forward, no .”
MATH60
“Study chapters and follow examples. No .”
060

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if possible. You've been warned.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Seems like a great guy, but his teaching methods aren't good at all.”

⚖️

25/100

“New teacher but knowledgeable, very straight forward, no .”

⚠️ Student Support

32/100

“Expects for his students to understand quickly, and can be very condescending if you ask for help.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Seems like a great guy, but his teaching methods aren't good at all.
  • New teacher but knowledgeable, very straight forward, no .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Study chapters and follow examples. No .
  • Expects for his students to understand quickly, and can be very condescending if you ask for help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and two are very brief, so confidence is limited despite consistent concerns.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH602 reviews
0601 review
113261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values