AI Rate Professor

Biology

Michael Haro

ENVRT101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Michael Haro only if you can handle course-to-course inconsistency in and grading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtremely lenient gradingMixed teaching qualityExam difficulty variesLow-effort A possible
  • One review describes an extremely easy A through online tests and grade flexibility.
  • Another review describes very difficult tests that require heavy memorization.
  • The small sample is sharply split, so the experience appears course-dependent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Getting an A can be very easy in one course, but and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, even though .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Course difficulty varies strongly, from not needing to know much to needing to memorize many policies and laws.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they conflict sharply by course.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

72/100

One review says participation was barely needed, but the .

In-person evidence suggests flexibility in one course, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students are split between loving him for leniency and .

All and is course-dependent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

One student reports a , but another describes very difficult testing.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and leniency appears stronger in course 201 than ENVRT101.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

One course sounds extremely light, while another requires heavy memorization for tests.

Format shift

no online review evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Comments show respect for him and affection in one course, but .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and teaching experience is inconsistent.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Both reviews focus mainly on tests, with little evidence of .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly split, with and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ them, do whatever.”
201
“ .”
ENVRT101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because while another had very difficult tests.

Online tests in an in-person courseLong test windowVery difficult tests

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

with a long window, while another had very difficult tests.

Online tests in an in-person courseThree-hour testsVery difficult tests
“you have 3 hours, they take about an hour for an A”
201
“ .”
ENVRT101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in grading and exams. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“New professor this semester he is a very interesting individual has worked hard to be what he is today.”

📈 Grade Effort

68/100

“he raised my grade from a whole letter for emailing him.”

⚠️

58/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades

  • he raised my grade from a whole letter for emailing him.
  • you have 3 hours, they take about an hour for an A even if you don't know a thing.

Theme 2

📝 About Exams

  • them, do whatever.
  • Unless you can remember about 90 policies and laws and have been a scientist for 10 yrs this class is not for you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they strongly conflict by course.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

2011 review
ENVRT1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values