AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Stepan Zargaryan

PRECA104 · TRIG102 · MATH025 · MATH103 · MATH10211454 · MATH60 · MATH070 · MATH060 · MATH130 · MATH058 · MATH104 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and can teach yourself the material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard To UnderstandConfusing Math InstructionSelf Teaching RequiredUnfair GradingAvoid If Possible
  • Most students describe Stepan Zargaryan as very difficult to understand and ineffective at explaining math.
  • Many reviews say students had to self-teach because .
  • A small , but the dominant experience is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some comments mention or being passed for effort, but , and serious risk of failing.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The math content becomes much harder because students and often incorrect.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

One student says he failed them for missing two classes, and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students warn against taking him because they could not understand the lectures and felt unsupported.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

There are some extra-credit and , but many students describe unfair or and hard finals.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, but , and self-teaching make the total burden feel heavy.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most comments say , and unable to explain or solve problems reliably.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews , and exam grading rather than projects or assignments.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, emphasizing unclear explanations, hard-to-understand lectures, and .

Main concern

Students who need clear instruction or structured help are likely to struggle.

What students said

“By far the .”
MATH10211454
“unless you are good .”
MATH60
“Good guy, bad teacher.”
MATH104

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult tests and finals with , though .

Hard TestsRidiculously Hard FinalNo Study GuidesTest Corrections

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe hard tests, no study guides, and a .

Hard TestsRidiculously Hard FinalNo Study GuidesTest Corrections
“No study guides for exams.”
MATH104
“ .”
MATH104
“Test grades could be improved after .”
MATH104

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“unless you are good .”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Good guy, bad teacher.”

⚠️ Clarity Problems

18/100

“It was incredibly difficult to understand what he was saying half the time.”

📈 Difficulty And Grades

34/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He is never prepared for class and even when he tries to teach, .
  • Good guy, bad teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • The .
  • No study guides for exams.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Clarity

  • his accent is impossible to understand.
  • Very difficult to understand what he is saying not just because of his strong accent, but because he mumbles and talks to himself just as much as the class.
  • unless you are good .

Theme 4

✅ Minority Positive Notes

  • Very helpful. Wants you to learn.
  • Very easy. Great teacher and .
  • I passed with a B+ and when I saw his gradebook, so did most of the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two detailed in-person reviews across many years show a strong and repeated negative pattern, despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MATH10413 reviews
MATH0704 reviews
MATH1034 reviews
MATH0252 reviews
MATH0582 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH602 reviews
MATH0601 review
MATH102114541 review
MATH1301 review
PRECA1041 review
TRIG1021 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values