AI Rate Professor

English

Leslie St. Martin

ENGLISH112 · ENGLISH101 · ENG204 · ENGLISH091 · ENGL091 · ENGL101H · ENGLI101 · ENGLISH094 · ENLG094 · ENGL094 · ENGLISH · 101H · TECH204 · ENGLI102 · ENG102 · ENGL101 · ENG094 · ENG101 · ENG101H · ENGLISH102 · 69 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can handle heavy writing with limited guidance and already have strong English skills.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy WorkloadUnclear ExpectationsPolarizing TeachingLimited FeedbackDiscussion Heavy
  • Students are sharply split between caring, engaging teaching and .
  • Workload is often described as , and discussion posts.
  • Grades can be manageable for , but expectations and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A seems possible for , but , and tough essay expectations make it costly.

The online evidence is harsher about grading, while work-heavy courses.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course content is not described as conceptually advanced, but the volume of , and .

Online reviews emphasize unclear structure, while , and personal teaching style.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, though some in-person comments mention being let out early and needing to keep up.

Online reviews focus on deadlines and workload, while in-person reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Many students strongly warn against taking her, especially online, despite a smaller group praising her as engaging and helpful.

Online recommendations are overwhelmingly negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students report vague rubrics and tough essay standards, though a few say she grades fairly or not too harshly.

Format shift

Online reviews lean strict, while , and frustrating.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many reviews , and weekend deadlines.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially workload-heavy, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Her teaching is polarizing, with praise for personality and engagement offset and .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is poor, while and strong criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears dominated by essays, reading, discussion posts, article reviews, and .

Format shift

Both formats mainly discuss writing assignments and discussions, not traditional exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person evidence is mixed, with some students praising her personality and useful writing practice while many complain about tangents, workload, and .

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistent teaching value and a workload that can feel larger than the course credit.

What students said

“If you're looking for an easy teacher, keep looking.”
ENG102
“She is amazing! Smart, funny, and fashionable.”
ENG094

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are consistently negative, citing vague rubrics, poor feedback, and .

Main concern

Students say online help and while .

What students said

“Worst English Professor ever.”
ENG101
“Horrible class. unless you want to do nothing else but read and write all day and night.”
ENG102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment appears mostly writing and assignment based.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyWriting ProjectsDiscussion Posts

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and final projects but do not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring policies.

Writing ProjectsDiscussion PostsQuizzes Mentioned
“All the work you do justs preps you for the ”
ENG204
“4 essays, 5 quizzes, and many discussions!”
ENG102

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're looking for an easy teacher, keep looking.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and feedback. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“St. Martin is unclear, vague about expectations & lacks the ability to teach the subject matter.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“ unless you want to do nothing else but read and write all day and night.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She got to know all of the students and made sure we knew each other.
  • Spends too much time telling useless stories and failing at connecting them to the concepts in class.
  • She is everything you want in a professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There were a lot of assignments, but I actually enjoyed most of them.
  • Not a though.
  • She's a , so be prepared to spend a lot of .

Theme 3

💬

  • Nothing is ever good enough!
  • but is always there for assistance.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

69

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The 50 reviews span many years and provide detailed, consistent themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 513
3 out of 57
2 out of 59
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ENG10214 reviews
ENG1017 reviews
ENG0946 reviews
ENGLISH1013 reviews
ENGL0942 reviews
Show 15 more courses
ENGLISH2 reviews
ENGLISH0912 reviews
ENGLISH0942 reviews
101H1 review
ENG101H1 review
ENG2041 review
ENGL0911 review
ENGL1011 review
ENGL101H1 review
ENGLI1011 review
ENGLI1021 review
ENGLISH1021 review
ENGLISH1121 review
ENLG0941 review
TECH2041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values