AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

S Cattel

MATH68 · MATH025 · MATH25 · MAT058 · MATH60 · MATH058 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
7/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and can teach yourself under heavy workload and harsh classroom conditions.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude and condescendingConfusing lecturesHeavy homeworkSelf-teaching requiredAvoid strongly
  • Most , and fear of asking questions.
  • as excessive, sometimes hundreds of problems per night.
  • A few positive reviews exist, but they are overwhelmed .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students , and widespread failure or dropping.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The math content may be basic-level, but students say her confusing pace and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an , but students describe class as stressful and hard to miss because falling behind is likely.

Only in-person reviews discuss classroom experience; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students because of rude behavior, poor explanations, and .

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students report failing tests, strict methods, and little help, with almost no evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

as ridiculous, exhausting, and sometimes more than 300 problems per night.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Most comments describe her as , and intimidating when students ask questions.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention homework, tests, and all comments.

Format shift

Assessment evidence appears only in in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing rude , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say she is condescending, unhelpful, and assigns too much work.

What students said

“ !!! !!!!”
MATH058
“Over 300 problems of !”
MATH60
“It was like teaching myself.”
MATH058

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and quizzes, including required use of her method, but do .

Tests and quizzesRequired specific methodHard tests reported

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and required methods, but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring.

Tests and quizzesRequired specific method
“makes you use "the and ”
MATH058
“Only 3 people passed the !”
MATH60

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!! !!!! Very rude, mean, snaps at you when you ask a question, hardest class I have ever taken”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and classroom climate. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ !!!!”

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

“Over 300 problems of !”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“ . .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is
  • She really is the .
  • It was like teaching myself.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Only 3 people passed the !
  • Over 300 problems of !
  • makes you use "the and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • students are afraid to ask questions
  • she made me cry and feel very dumb
  • She discourages students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 24 reviews across many years show a strongly consistent negative pattern with detailed examples.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MATH05811 reviews
MATH0256 reviews
MATH253 reviews
0581 review
MAT0581 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH601 review
MATH681 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values