AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Angela Suh

PSYCH1729507 · PSYCH101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you mainly want an easy grade, not if you want strong psychology instruction.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy AOpen-Book ExamsWeak TeachingReads SlidesVery Lenient Grader
  • Students consistently describe the class as extremely easy and graded very generously.
  • Exams are described as open book or book-allowed, making assessment highly student-friendly.
  • Teaching quality is the major problem because students say she reads slides and lacks subject knowledge.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

96/100

Students say she gives very high scores on written work and allows books or notes on exams, so the grade is extremely easy.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

91/100

Students repeatedly call the class easy and say exams and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly state .

In-person , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

She is useful for students seeking an easy grade, but .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

98/100

Students repeatedly say she is a and gives near-perfect credit on written work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Featherlight

95/100

The workload appears very light because students describe easy reflections, open-book exams, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students , and often cannot answer psychology questions.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention reflection papers, essays or written work, and and tests.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

open-book exams and but weak teaching and limited subject expertise.

Main concern

Students say she does not really teach and struggles to answer psychology questions.

What students said

“ .”
PSYCH1729507
“She just reads off the slides.”
PSYCH101
“ and basically gives 100% on all essays and written work.”
PSYCH101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as open book or book-allowed, making the exam style highly student-friendly.

Open BookOpen NoteBooks Allowed On Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

98/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or allow books during tests.

Open BookOpen NoteBooks Allowed On Exams
“ .”
PSYCH1729507
“let you ”
PSYCH101
“lets you ”
PSYCH101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and basically gives 100% on all essays and written work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She just reads off the slides. Doesn't really teach.”

📈 Easy Grade

96/100

“ and basically gives 100% on all essays and written work.”

📝

98/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • EASY class. .
  • Gives 100% on pretty much everything you turn in.

Theme 2

📝 About Exams

  • .
  • let you
  • lets you

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She just reads off the slides.
  • Doesn't really teach.
  • Doesn't know the answers to the questions students ask.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews are available, but they are recent to each other and and weak teaching.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSYCH1013 reviews
PSYCH17295071 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1