AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

J Eisenlauer

ANTH220 · ANT220 · ANTHRO220 · ANTHR220 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him if you enjoy anthropology and , but avoid him if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInteresting TopicsReading HeavyHard Tests With CurveLecture HeavyMixed Teaching Clarity
  • Students often find the anthropology topics interesting and the professor helpful or kind.
  • The course and long lectures.
  • Tests can be hard, but at least and another mentions .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

An A is possible with , and , but students repeatedly say the tests and readings are hard.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content is challenging because it and hard-to-understand material.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person anthropology reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because one tag says skipping means you will not pass and another review mentions staying for the whole three-hour class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students who like the , but others warn that , and difficulty can be frustrating.

Recommendation and is mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Tests are hard, but a curve and make grading more forgiving than the difficulty alone suggests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The workload is heavy because students must read difficult textbook material and peer-reviewed articles.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

He is described as helpful and interesting by some students, but one detailed review calls him a bad teacher with monotone lectures.

Format shift

and is sharply mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews emphasize tests and required reading, with less evidence of .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe an interesting but and uneven teaching clarity.

Main concern

The main concern is difficult reading combined with monotone or off-topic lectures.

What students said

“His class is very difficult and he does not do the .”
ANTHRO220
“ but .”
ANTHRO220
“The mostly peer-reviewed articles”
ANT220

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as hard but curved, and reviews do not .

Hard TestsCurve

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but does not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsCurve
“ but .”
ANTHRO220
“His class is very difficult and he does not do the .”
ANTHRO220

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The information you learn is really interesting, and if you manage to stay for the whole 3 hour class you'll learn lots of random information.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“I feel like he's probably a good anthropologist, but a bad teacher.”

📚 Course Challenge

35/100

“The mostly peer-reviewed articles”

⚖️

62/100

“ but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are very monotone and he goes off topic very easily
  • .
  • Eisenlauer likes to lecture but enjoys student input.

Theme 2

📖

  • He focuses a lot on the textbook and requires you read it.
  • The if you dont read and if you do read it is very difficult to understand.
  • He's helpful and offers .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

67/100

Evidence confidence

and show recurring themes, but opinions are mixed and some details are limited.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANT2202 reviews
ANTHRO2202 reviews
ANTH2201 review
ANTHR2201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values