AI Rate Professor

History

Gregory Schrout

HIS111 · HIST11292201 · HIST111 · HISTORY111 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if and writing, but expect steady written work rather than a no-effort class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging discussionsPoint-based gradingWriting-heavyMixed workloadApproachable but uneven
  • Most in-person reviews describe an engaging, relaxed class with .
  • The course is writing-heavy, with frequent posts, papers, and participation work.
  • One review strongly conflicts with the and little help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The and writing routine is managed.

All authoritative evidence is from in-person reviews, despite one review saying it took an online class.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The content sounds approachable and discussion-based, but the repeated writing and research keep it from being effortless.

, and they mostly describe a relaxed but writing-heavy history course.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Class participation and in-class activities matter, but reviews .

In-person comments mention class participation and activities, while there is no online review evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and flexible grading, but one review warns strongly against the class.

The recommendation and is mostly positive with one severe negative outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students describe a , and the ability to stop after reaching the desired grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The class has multiple papers, frequent online posts, and participation work, even when students say it becomes manageable.

Format shift

routine manageable and one calling it excessive.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students call him engaging, approachable, and enjoyable, though one says he is not helpful.

Format shift

All counted evidence is in person, and the teaching signal is positive with one strong negative exception.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mention papers, posts, participation, activities, and .

Format shift

In-person .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person evidence is mostly positive, emphasizing engaging discussion and a their target grade.

Main concern

The workload can feel heavy because of , and research-based assignments.

What students said

“Greg is a really engaging professor.”
HIST111
“Once you reach the grade you want you can be done with the class.”
HIS111
“makes u post 4 days a week twice a day and write a .”
HISTORY111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and assessment is based on writing and participation.

No TestsPapersDiscussion PostsClass Participation

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly support a no-test, writing-and-participation format.

No TestsPapersDiscussion Posts
“4 o 5 essay. no test.”
HIS111
“There are ~6 papers, weekly discussion online questions (hw), and in-class activities.”
HIST111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Once you reach the grade you want you can be done with the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Greg is a really engaging professor.”

⚖️

78/100

“Once you receive the score you want, you are done.”

📝 Workload Reality

48/100

“makes u post 4 days a week twice a day and write a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Greg is a really engaging professor.
  • Very approachable.
  • Awesome teacher. Really chilly guy and you learn more about our world then something.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • Once you receive the score you want, you are done.
  • He is not a .
  • There are ~6 papers, weekly discussion online questions (hw), and in-class activities.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • he is not .
  • you learn nothing and hes a !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they include useful detail and mostly consistent patterns with one major outlier.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIS1111 review
HIST1111 review
HIST112922011 review
HISTORY1111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values