AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Evelyn Ngo

MATH025 · MATH075 · MATH070 · STATS140 · MATH140 · INTER070 · MATH75 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want support, but be cautious for statistics if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful When EngagedMixed Teaching ClarityFair TestsStats ConcernsBeginner Support
  • Most students describe her as helpful and caring, but and rushed PowerPoints.
  • The class can feel simple for lower math courses when students pay attention and complete the work.
  • Grading and structure receive mixed feedback, including one complaint that the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A seems realistic in some lower math classes if students pay attention and do the work, but stats complaints keep it from being a guaranteed easy A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

Lower math courses are often described as simple and step-by-step, while statistics is described as rushed and harder to follow.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

, but several strong negative reviews warn against taking her for stats.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students mention fair tests and passing by doing the work, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

63/100

, and study tips, with little evidence of excessive assignments.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Many students call her clear and helpful, but several stats reviews describe weak examples and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

work, notes, and occasional poster presentations.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with many students praising her help and .

Main concern

Some students .

What students said

“Excellent teacher. She takes the and is always willing to answer questions.”
MATH075
“ . Doesn't give enough examples.”
STATS140
“ and from the book.”
MATH075

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews support fair , but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, or .

Tests From BookTests Based On HomeworkFair Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and based on class materials, but do not clearly prove exam rules such as .

Fair TestsTests From BookHomework-Based Tests
“ and from the book.”
MATH075
“And .”
MATH070

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a wonderful teacher and one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course clarity. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“She is a wonderful teacher and one of the .”

⚖️

62/100

“ and from the book.”

📉 Clarity Risk

45/100

“ . Doesn't give enough examples.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Awesome teacher! teaches step by step and a problem
  • She takes the and is always willing to answer questions.
  • She doesn't give a lot of examples and teaches through a powerpoint.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her class is very simple if you just pay attention.
  • It is almost impossible to fail this class.
  • It was a bit challenging but having a professor who is willing to help and cares about her students made the class smooth and easy.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • .
  • Can't hear her in the back of the class.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across several years give consistent positive and negative themes, though all are older and in person.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH0755 reviews
MATH1403 reviews
MATH0252 reviews
MATH0702 reviews
INTER0701 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH751 review
STATS1401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values