AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Amy Kelleher

MATH025 · MATH103 · MATH070 · MATH060 · MATH140 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself math and only need a strict structure to keep you working.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandSelf Teaching RequiredMandatory AttendanceStrict HomeworkKind One-on-One
  • Many students say and .
  • Several reviews say attendance is mandatory even when lectures feel unhelpful.
  • Positive reviews describe her as kind and helpful after class, but usually only for students who already work hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A seems possible only for students who do all homework and already understand the .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

31/100

The course content is and frequent reliance on self-teaching.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

Multiple students say and strict, even when they found class time unhelpful.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

because they found the and the course frustrating.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and students describe needing hard work rather than grade leniency.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Weekly homework and many students.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students repeatedly describe lectures as , and hard to understand despite some kindness outside lecture.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention homework and tests, but do not give .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and needing to learn from the book.

Main concern

Students often felt they had to teach themselves because .

What students said

“the book is your only real aid in her class.”
MATH070
“ and .”
MATH103
“ and teaching yourself.”
MATH060

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests tied to homework understanding, but do .

Tests Linked To HomeworkUnclear Exam Preparation

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and homework preparation, but do not clearly prove the .

Tests Linked To HomeworkUnclear Exam Preparation
“As long as you DO THE the tests”
MATH025
“If you do the homework and understand everything, you will do well on the test.”
MATH103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and teaching yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“she has ZERO clarity in her teachings.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

20/100

“ .”

📚 Self Teaching Load

30/100

“the book is your only real aid in her class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is incomprehensible and rushes through sections.
  • Her English is incomprehensible, and poorly constructed.
  • she has ZERO clarity in her teachings.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Work

  • I got an A because I worked really hard.
  • and .
  • As long as you DO THE the tests

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • .
  • She is a very kind teacher and reciprocates respect when given to her.
  • She's a very nice and understanding lady.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve detailed in-person reviews over several years show a consistent pattern of and .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH0604 reviews
MATH0253 reviews
MATH1032 reviews
MATH1402 reviews
MATH0701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values