AI Rate Professor

Computer & Informational Tech.

Marianne Nikodem

CIT116 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

unless you can work independently and do not need much instructor help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCondescending ToneLow HelpfulnessSlow Email ResponseSelf-Directed Class
  • Both reviews criticize her support and communication despite acknowledging subject knowledge.
  • Students describe the class as easier only if they already have strong writing skills.
  • The main risk .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

The class may be easy for students who already write well, but getting an A is not clearly easy for those who need guidance.

All evidence is from in-person or .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material seems manageable for prepared students but difficult without writing skill or instructor support.

treated as in person by the provided format rule.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

No online evidence exists, and policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Students mainly warn against taking her because of condescension, poor help, and slow responses.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Reviews , though one student found the class fairly easy due to prior skill.

Format shift

, and .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is not described as heavy, but lack of help may make normal work feel harder.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students say she knows the subject but is condescending, unhelpful, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The , but assessment details are limited.

Format shift

, and it does not give a full assessment breakdown.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but consistently negative about helpfulness, tone, and responsiveness.

Main concern

Students may receive little help and feel talked down to when they ask questions.

What students said

“she is extremely condescending.”
CIT116
“She is the .”
CIT116
“She was extremely slow at responding to emails if she even responded at all.”
CIT116

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or testing format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourselves a favor and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching support, tone, and communication. Credibility rating: Low.

🚩 Recommendation Level

25/100

“Do yourselves a favor and .”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Support

30/100

“She is the .”

📩 Communication

30/100

“She was extremely slow at responding to emails if she even responded at all.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Marianne knows her stuff, but she is extremely condescending.
  • she looks at you and talks to you as if you're stupid.

Theme 2

🧭 About Support

  • She is the .
  • if you are not good at writing this class will be very difficult because you will have no help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, so the but the evidence base is small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIT1162 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values