AI Rate Professor

Geography

Jack Kranz

GEOL101 · GEO102 · GEOG102 · GEOG101L · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you can work independently and tolerate disorganization in exchange for a potentially easy grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProEasy A PotentialDisorganizedPoor GuidanceSlow GradingLight Attendance
  • Students often describe the course as easy or potentially an easy A, especially when basic work is completed.
  • The main complaint is severe disorganization, , and wrong due dates.
  • Teaching support is inconsistent, with several students saying he gives little guidance and is slow or difficult to reach.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Several comments call the course easy and one explicitly says students can get an easy A by doing the work, despite poor organization.

All authoritative format evidence is counted as in-person because every review has isForOnlineClass false.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The course content is often described as easy, but confusing guidance and .

All authoritative format evidence is counted as in-person because every review has isForOnlineClass false.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

One detailed review and participation is optional.

All attendance evidence comes from in-person-classified reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

because the class is disorganized, confusing, and poorly supported.

All authoritative format evidence is counted as in-person because every review has isForOnlineClass false.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

The grade can be lenient because students describe an easy A if work is completed, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Some reviews call the course easy, but others report tons of , and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students repeatedly criticize his , and weak responsiveness despite a few positive comments.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention assignments, lab-book work, exams, and assessment type.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person-classified reviews describe an easy course with but major problems with organization, guidance, and responsiveness.

Main concern

The biggest risk is disorganized teaching with , and weak support.

What students said

“Nice guy, easy course.”
GEO102
“Disorganized and boring class.”
GEOG102
“virtually no instruction/lecture/Q&A/or basically effort on his part to 'teach' anything to the class.”
GEOG101L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and exams with ambiguous questions, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, proctoring, or .

Ambiguous TestsExams mentionedPolicy details unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or specific midterm and final policies.

Ambiguous TestsExams mentionedPolicy details unclear
“ .”
GEO102
“100% of the assignments are out of a the material.”
GEOG101L

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nice guy, easy course. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching quality, grade value, workload, and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Disorganized and boring class.”

📈 Easy Grade Potential

80/100

“do the work and you'll get an easy A.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

34/100

“He did not follow the syllabus and we had to catch up at the end.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Kranz is very nice; , and his lectures are informative.
  • Disorganized and boring class.
  • virtually no instruction/lecture/Q&A/or basically effort on his part to 'teach' anything to the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Nice guy, easy course.
  • do the work and you'll get an easy A.
  • tons of work for a 1 unit course

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • .
  • he , and exams.
  • He was posting wrong due dates, and he .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because eight reviews provide consistent negative patterns, but some comments are older and a few conflict on ease and teaching quality.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

GEOG1023 reviews
GEO1022 reviews
GEOG101L2 reviews
GEOL1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values